Talk:Reframing

Unclear sentence
I just deleted a claim that "it is 'ironic' that A Bug's Life will continue to be available in fullscreen (4:3)". Exactly how is this ironic? "Ironic" doesn't just mean "strange" or "coincidental".

My main reason for this post is this sentence:


 * It should also be noted that reframing can only work on the earliest CGI animated films because of the ability to move and even alter characters, props, and entire backgrounds and scenes with ease.

I don't know what the above is trying to tell me:


 * Because altering of scenes is a lot more elaborate on later films, reframing is only feasible on the earlier ones,

or


 * All the movies can be reframed if needed, but the ease of doing so is the only thing making it feasible to do for the early ones?

Which is the correct interpretation of this sentence? — RobertATfm (talk) 16:53, April 16, 2016 (UTC)