aka Jeff Kays

Bureaucrat Admin
  • I live in Minnesota
  • I was born on January 23
  • My occupation is Consultant/developer
Revision as of 16:35, September 16, 2019 by TotallyLogical (Talk | contribs)

| User:Dvcnut


I have (finally) created archive pages for all the content that had been on this page. I have broken up the content by year. You can find the archives at:

Unneeded Images

Could you please kindly delete the Pumbaa image and duplicate image of Lightning disguised as Stanley. The former image is NOT Pixar-related at all, and the latter image already exists. I'd appreciate it. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 19:09, January 15, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2


Please block RebeccaTaylor 1972. She is vandalizing the Billy Oilchange article, she recreated that Pumbaa image, which has nothing to to with Pixar, and now she's blaming me for reverting her edits on the Billy Oilchanger article, which I had nothing to do about because RaptorWiki was the one who reverted them, and she even threatened to block me for 9 months. She is the one who needs to be blocked, so please do so if you kindly would. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 19:23, January 15, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2


Wiki user Cbbazinga12 is vandalizing articles again. He just vandalized the "Buster" article and many others in the past. Please permanently block him because I tried leaving him a message about it and he ignored it. He's an unruly wiki user who shouldn't be on this wiki site at all. Kindly block him for good. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 22:00, February 5, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Message from Wikia

Jeff, did you see the latest message on my talk page? Any issues with you on that? Thanks! - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 12:16, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I did see it. I remember when we moved away from having wiki in the path, I think it's a much cleaner look. But no, I don't have a problem putting it back in as long as links without wiki still work. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 16:19, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Message from Shadowjonathan

Have you been sleeping under a rock for the last week? All of these posts are official! They dont have to be deleted!-shadowjonathan

Yes, we did see a number of them in the recent trailer but some like abstract thought you referenced unofficial sources. It's not clear yet what will actually show up in the film - things in trailers don't always show up in the film. We also don't create pages just to have more pages - when you write "not much is known", then there's no reason to have that page until we do know more. We want this site to be more about quality not quantity. I didn't remove Dream Productions because that looks to be a good part of the movie, and we should have locations for others like Imagination Land and Long Term Memory.
Also, I removed a number of un-needed categories. You asked RaptorWiki about it yesterday, he said we probably don't need any more categories and to ask one of the admins before creating any, then you went ahead anyways and created a number of them.
Another point, when you use a category like "Inside Out Locations", don't also use the "Inside Out" category, since "Inside Out Locations" is a sub-category of it.
Any other questions, let me know. --Jeff (talk) 18:07, March 14, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Zebra Mater

Please delete the "Zebra Mater" article if you kindly would. It is unofficial Pixar material.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 02:19, May 7, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I deleted it, thanks. --Jeff (talk) 12:13, May 7, 2015 (UTC)

Hercules (1996 film)

Please delete Hercules (1996 film) because it is NOT Pixar material at all. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 23:56, May 8, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Still waiting for you to delete that unneeded wiki article. GrayWolf2 (talk) 14:09, May 9, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2
I have added the film's logo to Category:Candidates for deletion, but there are over 100 images in there; a mass purge is needed (there's a script to delete everything in that category). One problem with this wiki is that the delete tag doesn't take (or doesn't require) a date parameter, making it impossible to tell (without digging in page histories) when a page is overdue for deletion. (On the Beatles Wiki, date and reason are both required parameters). — RobertATfm (talk) 14:21, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
That doesn't matter, Robert. Said article can STILL be deleted by any administrator regardless. Someone has to delete it because I am NOT an administrator (though I would like to be promoted to admin if that were possible and was granted the privilege to become one).—The preceding unsigned comment was added by GrayWolf2 (talkcontribs) 16:24, May 9, 2015 (UTC).
OK, I have deleted the page. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 15:58, May 9, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for Pixar Animation Studios produced Hercules (1996 film).—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RachelMack1992 (talkcontribs) 19:51, May 9, 2015 (UTC).

Nonsense. Hercules was produced by Disney Animation Studios, not Pixar; in 1996, Pixar weren't yet owned by Disney. Even today, although both are part of Disney, Pixar and Disney Animation Studios are separate divisions, which is why Wreck-It Ralph is credited to the latter, not the former. And as for deleting the spurious article, As Dvcnut has pointed out, you're too late; it's gone (and good riddance).
P.S. Always sign your posts on talk pages (four ~ characters); and never edit anyone else's post, except to correct abuse such as spam or vandalism, or you're committing vandalism yourself. — RobertATfm (talk) 20:41, May 9, 2015 (UTC)

Inside Out Quiz and Disney Infinity 3.0 Assets

Hey Jeff, long time no talk! I'm reaching out to you because we're working on something for the upcoming movie, Inside Out! We wanted to do a personality quiz and were hoping that we could host it on the Pixar Wiki. The quiz would live on an article page and we would direct people to that page, so this wikia would hopefully get some more activity from new users! A second thing I wanted to talk to you about was something for the upcoming Disney Infinity 3.0 game. Since it features a few Pixar characters, we were wondering about the possibility of debuting exclusive media (for example, an exclusive trailer) on the Pixar Wiki and drawing eyes to your work here. Whatever media we can get from the studio would have similar placement as the top unit on the Call of Duty Wiki where it says "Special to the Call of Duty Community".

Would the quiz and possible video be something you and the Pixar community would be interested in? If so, let me know and we'll do our best to provide you more details when we have them! Grace @fandom (profile)•(talk) 20:38, May 12, 2015 (UTC)

Hi Grace! Yes, I think we'd be interested in both the quiz and video/trailer, I think we'll see a large increase in activity as we approach the release of Inside Out so it would be fun to offer these things to both our new and regular visitors. Please let us know when you're ready to roll them out. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 02:13, May 13, 2015 (UTC)

Perfect! I'll let the team know :) Thanks for getting back to me so quickly! Grace @fandom (profile)•(talk) 20:32, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


Why'd ya delete Jangles? He's on the Dinsey Wiki!

CARTOONSROCK (talk) 00:44, May 18, 2015 (UTC)CAPTIAN CARTOON

Since the discussion is started, I am posting my thoughts here. Firstly, Disney Wiki is a wiki just like Pixar Wiki with user-generated content, and so it cannot be taken as a source. Now, there is one source to support the existence of "Jangles the clown", a book whose content can be viewed on Google Books.
It's definitively reliable I think, but nevertheless I think I agree with Jeff that it's too early to have a page. We know nothing about this character without reading the books (which I consider "cheating" since they tell the whole story).--Gray Catbird (talk) 25px-Gray_catbird_cars.jpg 01:34, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
Great explanation, thanks Gray Catbird. --Jeff (talk) 03:17, May 18, 2015 (UTC)


Cbbazinga12 is fussing with the antagonist role in articles on Cars, Monsters, Inc., Monsters University, etc. Could you please block him for a good long while, because he ignored my message and is continuing to vandalize said articles with such antagonist fussing. Please and thank you.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 19:06, May 30, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Urgent!

Cbbazinga12 is fussing with the antagonist role in articles on CarsMonsters, Inc.Monsters University, etc. Could you please block him for a good long while, because he ignored my message and is continuing to vandalize said articles with such antagonist fussing. Please take care of him immediately.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 01:18, May 31, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Cbbazinga12

Cbbazinga12 is at it again with the antagonist wars and inserting false information into articles. He completely ignored the message you sent him. He needs to be blocked for a good long while, so please block him if you kindly would.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 00:19, June 6, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Thank you for the message and reverting those changes. I have blocked him. --Jeff (talk) 02:13, June 6, 2015 (UTC)


CARTOONSROCK is getting out of line with the *tagonist issues, and is making unneccesary revisions in the text in certain articles. You might have to block him for a while because he needs to seriously cool off.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 00:40, June 9, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2


Please block CARTOONSROCK if you kindly would. His edits are unnecessary and out of control! I can't keep up with him. He needs a LONG time out.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 01:11, June 9, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2


Please block CARTOONSROCK right away. He's vandalizing articles with his antagonist wars or inserting info that is not necesssary to include in articles, plus he ignored the messages you left him previously. He needs a LONG time out. Repeat, please block him.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 17:39, June 9, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2


He's NOT listening to the last message you sent him. He needs to be blocked for a very long time, and I mean immediately. Please, if you kindly would, block CARTOONSROCK right away.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 17:56, June 9, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I'm holding off on blocking him for the moment. His recent changes haven't been regarding antagonists or villains. Plus, I would not characterize his behavior as vandalism - I think he is trying to make good edits although that hasn't been the case. I did warn him again just now on modifying his editing behavior; if he continues making unhelpful edits I will block him. Thanks for helping fix his errors. --Jeff (talk) 17:57, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

Shorts Characters Category

Hello Jeff. Just now most of the characters from the Toy Story shorts (either Toons, Treats or the TV specials) have been added to the "Shorts Characters" category. Before I do anything, since the amount of pages involved is enormous, I want to check with you: is it correct that since those pages are already in the sub-categories "Toy Story Toons Characters" etc., they shouldn't be in the parent "Shorts" category? Thanks.--Gray Catbird (talk) 25px-Gray_catbird_cars.jpg 19:11, June 11, 2015 (UTC)

Sigh, yes, I don't think we want them showing up in both the Shorts category and a sub-category. What a pain! I think I remember cleaning up some similar characters last year. Maybe GrayWolf2 would be willing to help out? It looks like he added the shorts category to a number of characters recently. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 19:26, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
Et voilà! Everything has been undone by GrayWolf and me.--Gray Catbird (talk) 25px-Gray_catbird_cars.jpg 22:28, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
Wow, you did that quick, thanks for taking care of it! BTW, will you be seeing Inside Out next week? --Jeff (talk) 00:18, June 12, 2015 (UTC)
Totally!! Very excited to see a new Docter film, which seems to have some pretty unique ideas, too. If everything goes well, I should be seeing it on that special event, three days early. It would be the first time I go to a special event for a Pixar film, I hope it will be good!--Gray Catbird (talk) 25px-Gray_catbird_cars.jpg 02:39, June 13, 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I will also be attending that event, there's no way I would miss the chance to experience a Q&A with Pete Docter and Jonas Rivera! I think it's going to be a great movie, it definitely has all the signs of Pete Docter's creativity and imagination! --Jeff (talk) 04:26, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

(Disneyfriend (talk) 15:48, June 18, 2015 (UTC))Hi my name is disneyfriend, Hi have ques

--Disneyfriend (talk) 23:37, June 18, 2015 (UTC)

HI my name IS disneyfriend, II a question


I have to ask a favor. -- GROUCHMan (MY TRASH CAN) 22:38, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Hi Dvcnut, my pleasure. Ya just can't tell anyone that I've been helpful lately. The other GROUCHES EVER find out about that, I'm RUINED!! & that favor is, I was lookin around your talk page, cause I found the redirect page for Riley Andersen (just plain Riley) linked here, so I could pipe the redirect but I just can't find it & it's drivin me crazy. I was wonderin if u could just pipe it for me, so I don't go mad. Thanks!! -- GROUCHMan (MY TRASH CAN) 19:32, June 25, 2015 (UTC)
You know, now that you mention Riley, I've thought of another benefit of NOT changing those links to the full name like Riley Andersen. You're having to go around to a lot of pages making these changes, and then if we decide Andersen is NOT the correct spelling and that it should be Anderson, someone will have to go back and change all of these links again. It's a lot of unnecessary maintenance. By just leaving the links to Riley, then all we need to do is update the redirect and all those links continue to work. So I don't see a need for you to go making these types of fixes, especially on talk pages. The same goes for changing links like Pixar to Pixar Animation Studios. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 20:25, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Riley's First Date

I am going to try to find an official source for the short. --Zootopian (talk) 01:28, July 6, 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! It would be great to get official news about that short. Just remember, it must come from Disney or Pixar; sites like IMDb are not considered official. --Jeff (talk) 01:34, July 6, 2015 (UTC)!10/josh-cooley/ Not an official source, but they should be notable. --Zootopian (talk) 12:52, July 6, 2015 (UTC)

Three articles with no source in relation to Pixar media

David Doyle, Cloris Leachman, and Miss Thomas need to be deleted. The wiki user who created them had no genuine source to prove these article were in fact related to Pixar media. I left him a message about it being against the rules. Hope he listens to it. Anyway, please kindly delete those three articles as they have no significance whatsoever.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 03:08, July 17, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I have deleted those pages and warned the user to stop creating these pages unless he can provide some official proof. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 03:38, July 17, 2015 (UTC)


Hello! We’re reaching out to a few of our communities, hoping to get you on board with the migration to the new infobox markup.Our goal is to make content portable and more mobile friendly. We'd like your wikia to look good across all devices. Is this something you'd be interested in? If so, let me know and I can convert them for you. :) Witnessme (talk) 17:08, July 22, 2015 (UTC)

I think we'd be OK with this change. What do you have to do to convert them? Is it changing the individual infoboxes or global styles? Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 21:40, July 22, 2015 (UTC)
I checked with one of the other admins and I think we're good with you making this change. Let us know when it will happen or when it's done. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 00:13, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

Awesome! I'll get right on it. Thank you!Witnessme (talk) 21:56, July 27, 2015 (UTC)

Reducing antagonist fussing

I am in the process of trying ot get the word out on an issue affecting several wikis and I'd like you to take a look at it.

I believe you have already seen the situations with the people listed earlier on your talk page who are engaging in what I'm calling "antagonist fussing". It's where people can't make up their mind as to what kind of antagonist a character is, so they continually change it and get into fights about it.

It's something that has been a problem for quite a while on a lot of wikis, but it wasn't until about a month ago that I decided to take a good look at the problem. The result was I wrote a blog and a policy against it for the wikis where I'm an admin. There's also five other pages that provide a more thorough explanation of the ten reasons why the policy was created, the 161 different ways they described Randall Boggs as an antagonist, an analysis of those edits, definitions to show how the words are bieng misused, and examples of what antagonist fussing would look like if two or more people were in the same room talking to each other.

I'd like for you to read at least the blog and the policy and consider making it a policy here as well. I'm trying to get people to stop using words like antagonist and protagonist on my wikis in favor of using better descriptions that show more clearly what the character does, rather than just a generic sounding "they're an antagonist" description in the opening paragraph on their page.

Let me know what you think about this and if the policy would be useful to you. —RRabbit42 (leave a message) 04:11, July 24, 2015 (UTC)

User: Oliviadibenedetto1234

This above user is adding new catergories, which is not allowed on this site and I told him/her to please stop, but he/she ignored my message, so could you please block him/her before he/she causes more mayhem. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 13:48, July 25, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: User: Oliviadibenedetto1234

She's doing it again. She hasn't paid any attention to the messages Gray Catbird and I left her yesterday. She needs to be blocked forever, so could you please do so, and I mean right now?

GrayWolf2 (talk) 13:40, July 26, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Graywolf, I already blocked her, a few minutes before you left this message for Jeff. :) - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 13:42, July 26, 2015 (UTC)

Timothy Spall and Igor Kayako

Please delete these articles: Timothy Spall and Igor Kayako, as they are not related to Pixar in any way. Wiki user Mentlege created them, and I left him a message to tell him to please stop creating articles that have no official source whatsoever. You might want to leave him a similar message as well and hope that he obeys, or else block him.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 21:20, July 28, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

OK, I deleted them. thanks! --Jeff (talk) 23:21, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Timothy Spall, Igor Kayako, Michael Bell, Police Officer Edwina and Cloris Leachman

Mentlege completely ignored my messages and recreated Timothy SpallIgor KayakoMichael BellPolice Officer Edwina and Cloris Leachman, which have no official source regarding Pixar. Please delete them, and then please block Mentlege if you kindly would, because he obviously doesn't care about the Pixar wiki rules.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 15:14, July 30, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

That user has been blocked. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 18:30, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

New URL structure

Jeff, please see here. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 11:24, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

Yea, I added a comment regarding their previous test to the new structure, hopefully those issues have been resolved. Thanks for the heads-up! --Jeff (talk) 14:08, August 5, 2015 (UTC)


Emergency! Wiki user RachelMack13 is creating articles that are NOT related to Pixar and Pixar movies that have no official source whatsoever. She ignored the message I sent her. Please block her right now before things get worse and please delete ALL the articles that were created by this user if you kindly would because they are false and/or illegal.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 01:21, August 14, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I have blocked the user and deleted all the pages. Thanks for the notice! --Jeff (talk) 01:39, August 14, 2015 (UTC)

Interlanguage links

Hello, I am a user intrested in expanding interlanguage links on this wiki. I'v seen you have links for several wikis alredy (de. es. fr. nl. ja. and he.). I ask the permission to make links to the Polish and Portuguese wikis. I could put language links on pages which have an equivalant if there is a minimum of content. I think that by doing so, it would be beneficial for both this and the other languages wikis.Plectrophane des neiges (talk) 02:38, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for offering this. I don't have a problem with you adding links to the Polish and Portuguese wikis, and I like putting links on appropriate pages. Thanks for offering this! --Jeff (talk) 03:02, August 16, 2015 (UTC)
Great! I've done a request to link the wikis here. --Plectrophane des neiges (talk) 03:16, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

New to wiki

Hi Jeff, I am new to the pixar wiki, and I'm looking to do a great deal of contributing towards the inside out side of things.

Pixjunky (talk) 19:15, August 16, 2015 (UTC)

Hey, it's great to have you here! I like the edits you've made so far, it seems you're taking your time and being deliberate about your changes. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 00:04, August 17, 2015 (UTC)

Might and Joy

We have a false arcticle that a new wiki contrubutor created, Might and Joy, that needs to be deleted. Please do so.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 21:43, August 21, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Might

Now wiki user Might031456 re-named the article Might which is still a false article and has no official source. Please delete that article as well and kindly block Might031456 because he ignored my previous two messages and is vandalizing this wiki site.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 22:05, August 21, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Might03156

This is an emergency! He is out of control. He is creating articles that are not related to pixar and inserting nonsense/gibberish into pages. Please block him permanently before this escalates.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 22:20, August 21, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2


Thanks for blocking Might03156, if you are the one who did it, but you still need to delete all the articles that he created, which are not related to Pixar at all. Please kindly do.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 23:56, August 21, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Gray Catbird blocked him. I did hopefully delete all the articles, images and videos he uploaded but if I missed any please let me know. Thanks!


He is at it again with the creating of articles that are NOT pixar related, and just created a sockpuppet of his original account, which is illegal as well. Please block him at once if you kindly would and permanently disable his account if you can do that as well.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 23:02, September 4, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I have blocked him, thanks. --Jeff (talk) 00:10, September 5, 2015 (UTC)

Buzz Lightyear is going to return

Of course, Buzz is going to return in Toy Story 4. It wouldn't be Toy Story without him.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by ANIMATION ROCKS (talkcontribs) 17:20, September 25, 2015 (UTC).

LOL, I agree with you! But until it's official we shouldn't publish it. It just helps keep things simple and reduce conflict. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 18:41, September 25, 2015 (UTC)

Excuse Me? What would Toy Story 4 be without BUZZ LIGHTYEAR?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by ANIMATION ROCKS (talkcontribs) 18:53, September 26, 2015 (UTC).

This Wiki

Why can't this wiki change to message wall instead of talk page? -- User:Homer77

We did enable the message wall for a short time on the wiki, but at the time the admins decided we did not like the format of it and how it worked, so we went back to just talk pages. I don't think we've received any complaints about the talk pages. Is there some huge benefit the message wall provides? --Jeff (talk) 03:21, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
When the World of Cars Drive-In Wiki was in a horrible mess, I briefly became an admin there to help with the clean-up, and some of the problems were caused by the articles having comments instead of talk pages. (One user was flooding an article with inane comments at the rate of several a day; I think he was trying to crack the wiki by causing a buffer overflow, but fortunately the authors of MediaWiki aren't stupid). Hence we switched back to talk pages, as they allow replies to replies and easy bulk deletion of spam posts, and have no disadvantages that I know of. — RobertATfm (talk) 06:13, October 4, 2015 (UTC)


Another unneeded article named "Computer" needs to be deleted as it has no significance to any Pixar media. Please delete said article. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 21:24, October 3, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

OK, I removed it and the Rats category, thanks for the note! --Jeff (talk) 21:40, October 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Might031509

That wiki user Might031509 is at it again. He created another sockpuppet of his old account, which is illegal, and is vandalizing the articles by inserting false info into them. Please block him immediately before this escalates. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 01:12, October 4, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Thanks, I've blocked him. --Jeff (talk) 01:49, October 4, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Jeff, I am a long time Pixar fan and this year alone have watched the original Toy Story countless times.  I have developed some theories of my own and would like to contribute to this wiki.Ibcarlo (talk) 22:16, October 18, 2015 (UTC)ibcarlo

It's always great to have new contributors here on the wiki. Just remember, the main wiki pages are for official news and information only. If you have theories, you can contribute them on your personal blog page. Thanks again! --Jeff (talk) 01:58, October 19, 2015 (UTC)


Might03159 has created yet anothet sockpuppet of his account and is putting false articles on this Pixar wiki site. Please block him at once if you kindly would and get rid of "Songs in Inside Out 2".

GrayWolf2 (talk) 02:03, October 31, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Yeah it has not been deleted yet! --Homer77 02:17, October 31, 2015 (UTC)

Just to Clarify my actions

I would like to mention that not only does Pixar have enough clowns within its canon to fill up this category, but the Clown category was already created by a previous user before being deleted. Weather it's generic or not is debatable, but I believe that you should at least reconsider. Also feel free to check out this article I made, see if it holds up to the wiki's standards and if so, share it with other fans. Pikazilla (talk) 11:45, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the response! Unfortunately what happens is if we don't keep a strict policy about this we will soon end up with categories like Males, Females, Dogs, Animals, etc. We just don't see how generic categories like that provide much useful information.

Naked Riley

A new user named BanjaminDKersting hase created a "Naked Riley" article, which DOES NOT need to be included. Please delete it. I left him a warning message on his talk page. If he continues to make unneeded edits or articles, please kindly block him.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 18:35, November 1, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

He completely ignored my message and is still messing with the "Naked Riley" article that needs to be deleted. Please block BenjaminDKersting right away and get rid of said article.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 18:38, November 1, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I have deleted the page and duplicate image. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 19:11, November 1, 2015 (UTC)


Pleas kindly delete the timeline article "2020", as it has no media to do with Pixar whatsoever.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 03:02, November 8, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Utility Belt Buzz

Ms354494 keeps removing important content from the Utlility Belt Buzz article without explaining why after Gray Catbird and I myself reverted his edits to said article. You might have to block him for a while because he is starting an edit war on said article, which is against wiki standards. Please consider because he will likely keep vandalizing the Utility Belt Buzz article.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 21:18, November 12, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf

He still is removing content from the Utility Belt Buzz article without good reason and is not stopping his unruly act. Please block him immediately before this escalates. He needs a long time out.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 00:08, November 13, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Anger, Fear, Joy, Disgust, Sadness images

Please remove the images of Anger, Fear, Joy Disgust, and Sadness with a Winnie-the-Pooh character, as "Winnie the Pooh" is NOT Pixar releated. See Special:NewFiles. I'd appreciate it.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 00:13, November 24, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Special:NewFiles

There are numerous images from the end credits of Toy Story 3 that ANIMATION ROCKS uploaded, which are NOT needed. Please kindly delete them. Also please delete the three non-Pixar See n' Say images including the one related to Sesame Street, which is NOT Pixar related.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 00:56, November 24, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Unneeded article

Please kindly delete Paramount Pictures Corporation, as it has no significance to Pixar whasoever.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 23:56, December 11, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Confirming email address

Hey Jeff, do you keep getting messages on Wikia asking you to confirm your email address? I've done it multiple times over the past couple months, and it never seems to take. I stopped getting emails from wikia as well. Hopefully this time it takes, but just wondering if you or anyone else was getting that message that wouldn't go away, even after confirming your email address. Thanks! - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 03:32, December 12, 2015 (UTC)

No, I don't get those messages, and I do receive the regular "has been edited by" email notifications. Have we talked about this before? At least it feels like I've talked about not getting emails before. Yea, hopefully it sticks this time, bit of a pain. Is it happening on all the wiki sites you're a member of? --Jeff (talk) 03:44, December 12, 2015 (UTC)
Well, in the past I just wasn't getting emails about edited pages, with no notification like this when I log in. And it was across all of wikia. But this time I get that message right at the top of every wikia page I log in to. I tried verifying it again just now, and the message went away, but I think that has happened before and the notification at the top just comes back, telling me to verify again. I never even got an email telling me I need to re-verify or anything. I just stop getting emails, period. I don't have that much time for editing any more anyway...we may want to get some more admins, unless you have already done so? Thanks. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 04:11, December 12, 2015 (UTC)
I found this blog post that sounds like the issue you're having, maybe it'll help fix it? No, I haven't looked for any new admins, I really like how the 3 of us work together, we all seem to be on the same page when it comes to edit philosophy, etc. I'll talk about it with Gray Catbird. --Jeff (talk) 04:38, December 12, 2015 (UTC)
That was pretty much the problem, yeah. But it's been almost a whole day, and it's still ok. I think it might be ok now. Thanks! - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 21:51, December 12, 2015 (UTC)

Cars 2 Credits

The full credits of Cars 2 is incomplete and needs to be revised. Please kindly update that article when you find the time to do so. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 20:34, December 13, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Actually, for me to add the official credits is a long process. I have to take the official press kit PDF, convert to text and then I have a couple Python scripts I run it through to get it into wiki format. Even so there is unfortunately a lot of manual work involved. So it's very time consuming but at least this way the information comes directly from the press kit, reducing typos and other mistakes. I'll see if I get time over the next couple of weeks to work on it. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 21:16, December 13, 2015 (UTC)

Unneeded article

Please kindly remove the article "Child (monsters university)", at it is unneeded.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 14:04, December 16, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Done. I was going to do that when I deleted Child (Monsters University) but forgot. Thanks for the reminder. --Jeff (talk) 14:09, December 16, 2015 (UTC)
The file "Kid.png" which was the page image for this article, also needs to be deleted (unless perhaps it can be used on the main Monsters University page), as does "barbie bawling.pmg"; the latter is an unusably dark image, and the uploader forgot to crop off the black bars. — RobertATfm (talk) 14:18, December 16, 2015 (UTC)
I agree with RobertATfm, though I think the image with the child should be deleted altogether, as it really isn't needed at all, not even for the Monsters University article. Also, the image of Barbie bawling also needs to be deleted for the reasons Robert described above.
GrayWolf2 (talk) 14:39, December 16, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2
OK, both images have been deleted, thanks. --Jeff (talk) 15:02, December 16, 2015 (UTC)


JFGfan2002 re-created that unneeded article "Child (monsters university)" and sent a threating message that reads: "Don't delete this, or I'll cut your head off!" Please delete said article and block this user at once for using harassment on this wiki site and edit wars with this article that had already been deleted before. He MUST be blocked because of what I just said above.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 03:58, December 17, 2015 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I think it's worse than that. Looking at the Recent Changes, especially the file uploads, it is fairly obvious that User:Rohan2002 and User:JFGfan2002 are both sockpuppets of User:ToyStoryRules (who admits on his user page that his real name is Rohan). I think the first two should thus be subject to an infinite block, and there should be an IP (range?) block on this kid. — RobertATfm (talk) 05:25, December 17, 2015 (UTC)
VSTF report filed. — RobertATfm (talk) 05:59, December 17, 2015 (UTC)
I have blocked Jacobmills815 and JFGfan2002. --Jeff (talk) 13:21, December 17, 2015 (UTC)


This is another recently-joined user whose only edits so far have been vandalism. A warning and perhaps a cool-off block is in order. — RobertATfm (talk) 05:44, December 17, 2015 (UTC)

User: The LandBeforeTimeFan2004

This user keeps labelling various characters as "antagonists", despite the fact that he clearly has no idea what "antagonist" actually means. (For instance, he cannot or will not see that Jerry Recycled Batteries is a justifiably-annoyed character, not an antagonist.) I left him a detailed message on his talk page, which he ignored; and he has now escalated the matter to edit warring, which to my mind is vandalism. He needs to be stopped. — RobertATfm (talk) 08:12, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

I have left him a message on his talk page. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 14:27, December 31, 2015 (UTC)

Yikes! it's my arch nemesis! GrayWolf2 and Jeff Kays! Remember Me? (takes off mask)

The Incredibles 2 Trivia

Could you please temporarily delete The Incredibles 2 Trivia article because it's much too early to have such an article yet. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 04:30, January 9, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I deleted this and The Incredibles 2 category. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 04:47, January 9, 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet user

We have a sockpuppet user named "IWasHavingTroubleLogingBackInMyAccounts". Please block him immediately because he made rules on his talk page about not deleting or undoing any of his edits to articles. He doesn't make the rules here, plus he made a sockpuppet of account. Please take care of him right away.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 07:02, January 11, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

The editor in question openly admits to being a sockpuppet of ToyStoryRules. It's fairly evident that User:TeletubbiesLover2002, User:Rohan2002 and User:Rohan2016 are three more, although it would probably be best to have the VSTF check to make sure. — RobertATfm (talk) 09:49, January 11, 2016 (UTC)
Yes, it would seem all these accounts are the same. For the moment let's keep a watch on them. I would recommend not engaging with them regarding the rules and such, which is giving them the attention they are looking for. If their edits get out of hand or they begin to vandalize pages please let us know and we will deal with it immediately. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 13:36, January 11, 2016 (UTC)

Let's fight!-Rohan

Interlanguage Links

Hi Jeff, some time ago I noticed a user who tried to make put on the front page a language link toward a Russian version though it didn't even exist back then. Recently it have been created. It presently has 24 pages. You can see the link here. Is it ok with you if I ask community central to make a bridge between this and the Russian wiki?

--Plectrophane des neiges (talk) 03:12, January 12, 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you can ask community central for the bridge, thanks! --Jeff (talk) 03:39, January 12, 2016 (UTC)

A113 in The Good Dinosaur

I've added to the "Appearances in Pixar Films" the A113 symbol seen in "The Good Dinosaur"; however, you might have to describe this A113 location in better detail.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 23:15, January 15, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Block Gchrome

Wiki user Gchrome is adding unneeded categories to articles, and he completely ignored my warning message. He needs to be blocked before this escalates, as there are a lot of articles that need to be reverted. Please block him immediately for a VERY long while.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 06:25, January 17, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

OK, I have blocked that user. Thanks for the notice, and for cleaning up! --Jeff (talk) 15:32, January 17, 2016 (UTC)

Suspect usernames

From the names, it appears that User:AmandaK77 and User:Mandi77 may be the same person. Although as far as I know she(?) has not (so far) done anything else wrong, it may be a good idea to keep an eye on this situation. — RobertATfm (talk) 07:20, January 17, 2016 (UTC)

OK, thanks! --Jeff (talk) 15:33, January 17, 2016 (UTC)

Remove Blog

Pleas kindly remove the blog "Jurassic Park is not a Disney movie" that Disneysaurus created because it doesn't need to be there. Many scenes from Pixar films have been parodied by other non-Pixar movies. So that blog is completely useless. Delete said blog if you kindly would.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 18:48, January 18, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I don't think there's a need to remove the blog post, unlike the official wiki pages, a blog post is where users can write about and discuss non-official topics, express opinions, etc. In fact, in this blog post the user isn't stating anything incorrect. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 19:23, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Two Unneeded Categories

Please kindly delete these two categories, which are not necessary to include: "Category:Movie References", and "Category: Toy Story That Time Forgots", the latter category being a typo.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 02:06, January 19, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

OK, deleted. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 03:18, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

How did i find the toy story 4 picture?-RohanHordern2016

i found a concept art on disney wiki, but it orignnaly belonged to a matthew luhn twitter page. - User:RohanHordern2016

Excellent, then I would consider that official enough as he is a Pixar employee. Can you still find the image on his Twitter page? If so, provide a link directly to the image. If you can't find the image, at least provide a link to Matthew's Twitter page. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 22:16, February 3, 2016 (UTC)
User:RohanHordern2016 says: here's the link
OK, I've removed your last comment and am going to pretend you never wrote it. Why would you say that? It is against wiki policy to have multiple accounts. As an admin, knowing that information I can (and should) permanently block you. But I am trying to be nice - you haven't been making poor edits as you did in the past, so I'm hoping you'll follow wiki policies. So if you want to stay on this wiki, don't bring that kind of attention to yourself and follow the rules. --Jeff (talk) 23:12, February 4, 2016 (UTC)


Can you block RohanHordern2016 on this wiki?, because that is his sock account previously blocked as Rohan2016.

Homer77 (talk) 05:13, February 17, 2016 (UTC)

I don't see much reason to block him. Yes, obviously, this is the same user as Rohan2016, but he has kept his edits under control, so I don't see much purpose in blocking him. --Jeff (talk) 14:44, February 17, 2016 (UTC)
Okay. --Homer77 (talk) 19:06, February 17, 2016 (UTC)
Do not block me! i won't make any more accounts.-Rohan


Please kindly delete the article WALL•E/Transcript, as well as the Category:Transcripts, as neither of them are needed at all. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 16:23, February 21, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Done. --Jeff (talk) 20:16, February 21, 2016 (UTC)

The Pixar Theory

The Pixar Theory article has been previously deleted, as it is NOT needed on this site, but wiki user Dr spartan keeps recreating it. Please kindly delete that article and message Dr spartan, telling him to stop recreating said article as it is not needed and if he does it again, he will be temporarily blocked. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 21:10, February 21, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Book Subcategories

Please kindly remove these subcategories: Toy Story Books, Monsters, Inc. Books, The Incredibles Books, Cars Books, Finding Nemo Books, Ratatouille Books, WALL-E Books, and Up Books because the categories "Books" and "[Pixar film title] Merchandise" already covers them.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 22:14, February 21, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Above message

Did you get my above message, and could you please kindly take care of what I stated above?

GrayWolf2 (talk) 02:19, February 23, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Edits

Sorry about that. It's a glitch in the Internet system on my line. I don't mean to cause problems at all on this site, as I have been a very good wiki contributor and have made excellent edits to articles in the past. I'll try to be more careful when making edits in the future so this doesn't happen. Again, I'm truly sorry and am not trying to be a nuisance.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 15:18, February 23, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

As I mentioned, I don't think your edits are intentional, and I greatly appreciate all your work on the wiki, cleaning up after vandals, and working to keep the pages consistent. As a tip, my usual mode of operation is to first use the "diff" link to find out what changes an editor has made, and then, if I see something I think needs to be changed, do I go into edit mode. I think that would help to reduce unwanted edits. --Jeff (talk) 15:33, February 23, 2016 (UTC)


Piratehat1234 keeps removing much of the factual credits from the article "Toy Story 2 Credits". I asked him nicely to please stop twice, and he completely ignored my messages. You might have to block him for a while, because he is causing problems with this unnacceptable behavior of deleting factual info from articles. Please kindly see to it. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 13:24, February 25, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2


This user has got himself renamed as User:MikeWazowskiROR, and has somehow managed to use this to come back and delete all the warning messages from his talk page. Is a rollback called for? — RobertATfm (talk) 18:23, February 25, 2016 (UTC)

When a user is blocked, the admin can decide to allow the user to have write access to their talk page, which is how the user was able to remove the content. I reverted the changes and changed the block to not allow write access to the talk page. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 20:03, February 25, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Piratehat1234

What about my above message? Piratehat1234 is most likely going to continue to vandalize the "Toy Story 2 Credits" article by removing factual credits from said article. He has done it to other Credits articles in the past as well.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 20:53, February 25, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Yes, I find it interesting he is doing that, I don't understand it. I was going to watch their behavior and see if it continues before taking any action - hopefully they will listen to the message you left them. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 21:09, February 25, 2016 (UTC)


Vandalism-only account; sole actions so far have been to vandalise File:Finding_Nemo_Nigel.png and File:Woody3.jpg. — RobertATfm (talk) 08:25, March 3, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Piratehat1234

You HAVE to block Piratehat1234 immediately! He still hasn't learned his lesson and is still removing factual credits from the Toy Story 2 Credits article. He needs to be blocked permanently because he keeps causing problems and has ignored my warning messages. Please kindly take care of him at once.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 14:49, March 12, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Actually, I went back to the official press kit for Toy Story 2 and the content he is removing is not in the press kit, so his changes are correct. I'm not sure how they got in there in the first place, but I will revert your last changes so the credits are correct. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 15:52, March 12, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Re: Piratehat1234

He's at it again! This time he is creating people articles that are not necessary to include, plus they have no official sources, and he ignored the message I sent him. You have to block him, and I mean RIGHT NOW, before this escalates. Then please kindly delete all the latest articles he created, which are not needed.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 17:24, March 12, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Unneeded articles

You still need to delete all the latest articles that Piratehat1234 created, which are not needed. Please kindly do so.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 23:29, March 12, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2


How can users participate in being an admin on this wiki? --Homer77 (talk) (contributions) 05:07, March 27, 2016 (UTC)

We choose admins from wiki users that have been active here for a long time. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 14:02, March 27, 2016 (UTC)
I see. --Homer77 (talk) (contributions) 23:28, March 27, 2016 (UTC)

new news


a user named DH2002 made another hank the octopus article, and an uneeded article called zoo.

Thanks, I hopefully have cleaned this up. --Jeff (talk) 03:11, April 3, 2016 (UTC)


Wiki user DH2002 uploaded some very poor quality "Finding Dory" images that have little or no significance at all. Please kindly delete them. Also, please delete the redirects. "Hank the octopus" and Moon fish", as well as any other new articles that he created which were unneeded and have been redirected. I did that because I couldn't find any other way to get rid of those unneeded articles since I'm not an admins and cannot delete such stuff.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 12:43, April 3, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I think I have them all. Feel free to mark pages with the delete template, makes it easier to track and find them. --Jeff (talk) 15:18, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

Blowin' In The Wind

Please kindly delete the article "Blowin' In The Wind", as it has little Pixar significance and need not be included on this site. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 03:12, April 7, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

 for what it's worth.. PIXAR'S Made In Point Richmond DVD Oym-museum (talk) 05:53, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

Do you have a copy of that DVD? I'd love to know how you came across it? --Jeff (talk) 12:27, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

As I recall, "Beach Chair" and "Flags and Waves" are hidden extras on the "Pixar Shorts Vol. 1" DVD. Perhaps this is also true of "Blowin' in the Wind"? — RobertATfm (talk) 06:46, April 7, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Piratehat1234 again

Please delete Kenny Condit, as the article is not necessary to include and has little Pixar significance. Also, Piratehat1234 is making unneeded edits to the "Toy Story 2 Credits" article. He obviously hasn't learned his lesson, so you might have to make his block longer or possibly permanent for that matter. Please kindly do something about him.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 01:57, April 13, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: VillainMatthew.Mira

You might have to block user VillainMatthew.Mira if he continues antagonist fussing with the Pixar characters. I left him a message about it, but he seems to have ignored it. Please kindly take care of him if you would. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 20:38, April 15, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Thank you for the notice, and for warning him regarding our policies. Let's keep an eye on him. --Jeff (talk) 21:51, April 15, 2016 (UTC)

Fanon rename

For at least the second time, the article Ms. Davis and its talk page have been moved (this time by User:Cartoonman25) to "Emily Davis" on the basis that "she was Jessie's former owner in flashback sequences". As far as I know, this is pure fanon/speculation; the only basis for this claim is that the two models (Emily and Ms. Davis) slightly resemble one another, there is absolutely no official source for this. The page "Talk:Emily Davis" needs to be moved back to "Talk:Ms. Davis" (the contents of "Emily Davis" have already been moved back to "Ms. Davis"), and possibly also "Emily Davis" and its talk page should be deleted and locked down to prevent this happening again. — RobertATfm (talk) 20:44, April 16, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Ms354494

You might have to block Ms354494 because he keeps making unneeded edits to the "Inside Out Trivia" article and a few other articles. I don't think leaving him a warning message will be enough in this case, as most users nowadays are too unwise to correct their behavior. Please kindly take care of him if he continues, which he most likely will.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 04:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

One of his latest changes (the deletion, for at least the fifth time and for no (stated) reason, of the "Riley's bedroom stars" trivium) was despite a warning by me to stop doing so. I reckon this is a clear vandal account, and needs to be dealt with accordingly. — RobertATfm (talk) 05:40, April 17, 2016 (UTC)

Non-Pixar related Trivia

I removed the non-Pixar related trivia to Johnny Worthington III, Hopper, and Mor'du since they are not related to Pixar, since such trivia has been removed from Buddy Pine by RaptorWiki. I take it that's what he's driving at, am I right?

GrayWolf2 (talk) 22:32, April 19, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Well, I'd say yes, it's not Pixar-related, but also it was a very generic comparison, I think you could come up with many similar situations where one character is similar to another. To me, a relevant piece of trivia would be a Pixar animator or employee stating they looked at some other character or film for inspiration. Even then, this would only require a single line of trivia. You may have noticed I also removed a number of entries from Randall Boggs trivia section, most that would fall under our enumeration policy. --Jeff (talk) 22:53, April 19, 2016 (UTC)
Yes, we don't need user-derived trivia like that. For example, the trivia about Syndrome's hair (which I forgot to remove, but you did)...somebody made that opinionated comparison on their own. A Pixar employee didn't say they looked at Jimmy Neutron's hair for inspiration. So there's no point in that piece of trivia, just because someone else thinks their hair is similar. I didn't just remove things purely because they weren't Pixar-related. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 11:32, April 20, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Giant squid

Wiki user DH2002 created an unneeded article "Giant squid" with poor quality images. Please kindly delete both the article and the poor quality images relating to it. Also, you might have to permanently block DH2002 because he is apparently a sockpuppet user of a previous account of which he was blocked from for the same reason. Please kindly take care of this sockpuppet user. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 14:03, April 22, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

i've deleted the page and related images. Why do you think the account is a sockpuppet, and of which account? --Jeff (talk) 14:09, April 22, 2016 (UTC)
Never mind, he is the same user from a previous message I sent you above. You will have to block DH2002 for a while, if not permanently for his unneeded edits.
GrayWolf2 (talk) 15:07, April 22, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Edit warring

User:Disneysaurus keeps editing the Jurassic Park References in Pixar Productions page to add "this is a non-Disney movie", as if (1) we didn't already know and (2) this was somehow relevant to something. He has also re-uploaded that non-Pixar dinosaur image which you already deleted. Action needs to be taken. — RobertATfm (talk) 20:46, May 2, 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I left the user a message and am monitoring the situation. --Jeff (talk) 21:24, May 2, 2016 (UTC)

Unusual CSS

Hey, Kirkburn from the Community Support team here.

I've been made aware that there's some odd CSS on this community on MediaWiki:Wikia.css and MediaWiki:Common.css which hides the useful byte-change info from Recent Changes (e.g. .mw-plusminus-pos { display: none; }). It looks like it's very old and has probably been forgotten about. You may wish to consider removing it? Or, if you wish, I can look at doing so for you?

Regard, Kirkburn (talk) @fandom 16:49, May 3, 2016 (UTC)

Interesting, I seem to remember having the byte-change info disappear one day (long time ago), and wondering what happened to it. Thanks for the pointer, I'll take a look at it and get it fixed. --Jeff (talk) 17:15, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
I was wondering why the change info wasn't showing for me. I some time ago fixed the problem for myself by creating my personal common.css, setting the properties to "display:inline". I also set the plus colour to "limegreen" (which as the name suggests is about midway in brightness between "green" (#008000), which I find too dark for this purpose, and "lime" (#00FF00), which I find too bright), the minus colour to "red", and the zero colour to "dimgray". — RobertATfm (talk) 20:10, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
If you already have the CSS for this, feel free to modify the wiki css pages. While I do CSS for my day job, it's not something I'm great at - I'm much more of a backend/DB kind of person! :) --Jeff (talk) 20:20, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
I don't have admin rights on this wiki, so I can't modify any page in the MediaWiki namespace. Getting the byte indicators to work is a simple matter of editing the two pages Kirkburn names, finding the three lines starting "mw-plusminus", and removing the "display:none" (or optionally changing it to "color:limegreen" or whatever as appropriate). — RobertATfm (talk) 03:42, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
OK, I updated the CSS, looks to be working, but if not let me know. --Jeff (talk) 14:56, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
It looks great to me! Thanks! --Gray Catbird (talk) 25px-Gray_catbird_cars.jpg 23:05, May 4, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Cartoonman

You might have to block wiki user Cartoonman because he attempted to change "Ms. Davis" to "Emily Davis" in the Toy Story 4 article, and he vandalized the Wheezy article as well. He might be a sockpuppet of a previous account so I thinks it's best that you permanently block him before this escalates. Please and thank you.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 00:27, May 8, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: It's a small world

Could you please kindly delete the article "It's a small world" that was created by user Small World fan2000 because it has nothing to do with Pixar whatsoever. Then you might want to message Small World fan2000 about creating articles that have little or no significance with Pixar. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 22:52, May 17, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

RaptorWiki already got to it, thanks. --Jeff (talk) 02:03, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

User:Gabriel P. S.

Keeps adding to Incredibles articles, what looks to me like fanon; has even engaged in edit warring over the Phylange article, restoring the exact same content after it got reverted. A warning, if not stronger action, is clearly in order. — RobertATfm (talk) 12:29, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

I don't think a warning message would be enough. Gabriel P.S. continues to do edit wars on those articles and he is not stopping, so I think he might have to be blocked for a while, so please kindly do.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 22:29, May 20, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: A Bug's Life 2

Please kindly delete "A Bug's Life 2" because it is completely fanon, and the source it came from is fanon as well. Also, please tell wiki user Surártico, who created said article, that it is illegal to create false Pixar film articles with fanon sources. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 15:18, May 21, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Gerald (Finding Dory)

Please kindly delete the article Gerald (Finding Dory) because there is no official source provided for this character whatsoever from the wiki user who created said article. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 00:08, May 25, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Never mind. Wiki user MarioLuigiKart said that this character came from an official Finding Dory trailer source.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 00:37, May 25, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Never mind my above message because of what you left MarioLuigiKart on his message wall.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 02:18, May 25, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Im sorry

Hey Jeff, Im sebastian, but you should rememebr me as Pixar 3. I want to apologize for all those editions I have done in the pixar wiki. The thing is that I was 11 at that time, so I was very silly and didt know that what I was doing was wrong, and also Im from argentina and I didnt understeand what does your messages of warning mean. Im very ashamed for what happened and I wish you can apologize me. Hve a nice day

Thanks for the apology, and don't worry! I look forward to having you be a contributing member of our wiki! --Jeff (talk) 00:43, May 27, 2016 (UTC)
thanks I will do my best this time!

Re: Bluebird565

Wiki user Bluebird565 is doing an edit war with the Monsters University (song) article, claiming that the lyric "Alma Mater" is related to the Pixar character, Mater from the car franchise, when the term actually means "university" or "college" in Latin. I left her a message about it and she ignored my message completely and continued to highlight "Mater" in the song lyric, thinking it has anything to do with Tow Mater from cars, which is does NOT, not even his customizations because I double-checked the Tow Mater article itself. You might have to block her because she won't stop reverting that edit that I undid to the Monsters University song article.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 20:34, May 28, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Re: Alexbgames

Please kindly block Alexbgames because he keeps vandalizing the Toy Story Credits article, Finding Nemo Credits article, etc., and completely ignored the messages that you or other admins left him. He may need to be blocked permanently before this escalates, so please kindly do so. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 03:37, May 30, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

He's still at it with vandalizing the Credits articles and completely ignored your warning message. Please block him, possibly permanently.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 15:23, May 30, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Unneeded article

Please remove the article Cruz Ramirez because it is too early to create such an article, plus there is not enough official info to confirm said Pixar character. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 23:27, May 30, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Another unneeded article

Please remove the article Gloom because there are no official sources to confirm this Pixar article. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 02:07, June 2, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Actually, I found out that Gloom is a real character concept that was abandoned. So I think we can keep the page, considering in addition that we have some other pages for discarded characters (e.g. Señorita Cactus, Zil).--Gray Catbird (talk) 25px-Gray_catbird_cars.jpg 02:37, June 2, 2016 (UTC)


I'm here to talk about wiki user ANIMATONROCKS. Since you blocked him permanently and he cannot message you on your talk page, he had me speak for him. He says that he is sorry for his actions and that it is unfair that you gave him an infinity block, which he says he doesn't deserve. He was hoping that once the block was over, he could go back and edit articles again within reason. He also says that he didn't know that you wanted him to send you a message for his actions. If you could please get this thing cleared up with him, you might allow him to edit on this wiki site again.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 02:48, June 2, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Does he read his talk page? He has write access to it, and as I wrote there when I blocked him, he needs to reply on his talk page and state: A) he has read our policies and will abide by them; and B) he will monitor his talk page and reply to messages left for him rather than just ignore messages he doesn't like. Once he does that, I will consider lifting his block. --Jeff (talk) 12:54, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

Pointless duplicate article

A user has created the stub article Pixar Animations Studios, presumably not realising that we already have a much better article Pixar Animation Studios. Please delete the duplicate. — RobertATfm (talk) 19:44, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

Done. --Jeff (talk) 20:08, June 2, 2016 (UTC)

On vacation

Hello Jeff, I just wanted to notify you that I will be away from today to August 3 with limited access to Wi-fi. So basically unfortunately I will be missing out on the whole month of July. I'll still try to monitor the activity a bit, but it'll definitely be slower.--Gray Catbird (talk) 25px-Gray_catbird_cars.jpg 19:30, June 27, 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the note! No worries, things have been pretty quiet here and I'll be around this month. Next month might be busier for me, I'll be gone for about 2 weeks from August 6 - 19 and may not have as much time to check on things. Hopefully you're going away on vacation, or doing something fun? If so, have a good time! --Jeff (talk) 20:34, June 27, 2016 (UTC)


CARTOONSROCK is vandalizing articles and making unneeded edits to them, plus this user is a sockpuppet account of ANIMATION ROCKS. Please kindly block him permanently and I mean forever, because he hasn't learned his lesson at all from the past messages, and I don't want this to escalate any further.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 13:22, July 19, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

As according to our blocking policy, since this is his second block I have blocked him for 3 months. His next block will be permanent. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 14:20, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

Fanon: action needed

User:Dinosaurgames has added what I think is a self-promoting and fanon link to The Good Dinosaur. I have of course reverted this, but I think further action may be needed. — RobertATfm (talk) 00:49, August 4, 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice, and for reverting it. Let's keep an eye on this user and I'll take action if necessary. --Jeff (talk) 03:23, August 4, 2016 (UTC)

More edit warring

User:Cutie Doggy keeps editing the Long Ge page, changing "who" to "that", despite it persistently being changed back by others (and despite being told that the Cars characters are anthropomorphic, so "who" is the correct term). Maybe something needs to be done. (And incidentally, instead of having to post separately to all admins' talk pages, wouldn't it be better to have a Requests for Admin Attention page?) — RobertATfm (talk) 19:45, August 9, 2016 (UTC)


This user keeps claiming that "Dee is Aline Toupi from ZOOM" and has not responded to my post on his talk page asking what evidence, if any, he has for this claim (and pointing out that "they look the same' is just coincidence, not evidence). He has a few minutes ago uploaded an image once again making this claim (and which is also of low resolution), and edited the "Toy Story 3 Trivia" page to insert the dubious claim/image. -- RobertATfm (talk) 15:13, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I've left the user my own message and have removed the image. Hopefully there won't be any further similar edits. --Jeff (talk) 17:43, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

Fanon flood!

User:Paige EM has uploaded 16 YouTube videos. Some of them are concerning "The Pixar Theory" and hence obvious fanon, some are fanon by virtue of their "sources" being Wikipedia, IMDB or the Wikia Disney Wiki. I suspect that those I haven't flagged for deletion are equally dubious.

I have left a message on her user page, but (apart from deleting all those videos) does anything else need to be done? — RobertATfm (talk) 02:55, October 28, 2016 (UTC)

I blocked the user for a day, just because of all the work to mark all those files for deletion, and then deleting them. Also left a message so hopefully we won't have any more issues. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 03:22, October 28, 2016 (UTC)

She has done it again, this time uploading a trivia quiz video cobbled together from Pixar movie clips. Does she not realise that, just because it happens to have "Pixar" in the title or to include their material, it doesn't automatically follow that it belongs here? -- RobertATfm (talk) 03:09, November 4, 2016 (UTC)

Yea, probably testing us to see if we noticed. Thanks for keeping an eye on things. I've deleted the video. --Jeff (talk) 11:54, November 4, 2016 (UTC)
And she has uploaded the video again. Has she no sense at all? I mean, one has only to read the comments to realise that this video is not only unofficial, but rubbish; several of the music clips are from the trailers, not the films as they're supposed to be, and one of them is from Planes — which, as several commenters have pointed out, is Disney, not Pixar. {Although several of the commenters have shown themselves to be just as dumb, asking "why hasn't The Lion King been included?") — RobertATfm (talk) 19:44, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

More problems

We have a user who is running three vandalism-only accounts (User:Franciswickersham57, User:Franciswickersham63 and User:Franciswickersham64) who needs to be blocked forthwith. There is also a vandal move of Trixie by User:Gamer4life56‎, and while I'm here, do we really need User blog:Paige EM/videos which serves only to spam a set of YouTube links? — RobertATfm (talk) 21:49, November 5, 2016 (UTC) I've blocked all 4 of those users. I also blocked Paige EM for a week and left another message. As for the blog page, I'm inclined to leave it - I always revert edits and tell people to write it on their blog page. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 23:28, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

Permanently block CARTOONSROCK

CARTOONSROCK is at it again with him making unecessary edits to many Pixar articles. Whoever unblocked him shouldn't have AT ALL. He needs to be permanently blocked because his behavior is NEVER going to change. He has had enough chances, so please consider permanently blocking him before this escalates. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 12:09, November 12, 2016 (UTC)GrayWolf2

I am keeping an eye on the user, and also had to revert some of his changes. But some changes seem valid; I see you reverted his Finding Nemo Home Video update, was it incorrect? Otherwise, it seemed fine to me. Let's keep watch and see what happens. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 14:13, November 12, 2016 (UTC)


This user's four contributions so far have all been to insert ages which are either unsourced (Sid Phillips, Hannah Phillips) or directly contradict the official information (Riley Anderson, twice — claiming her to be 12 rather than 11). She attempts to disguise this with meaningless "edit summaries", which in the Riley case are merely repeating the first paragraph of the article.

Once or twice may be ignorance or inexperience, but four times (especially the same edit a second time, after the first got reverted) is looking to me like deliberate vandalism. Perhaps something needs to be done. — RobertATfm (talk) 23:02, December 5, 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I'll try keeping an eye on the user, fortunately so far the edits are far apart (in time), so while it's hard to fathom why someone continues to make the same edit, at least it's not too painful to clean up. If that changes then we'll do something. --Jeff (talk) 00:24, December 6, 2016 (UTC)

User:Mikhael_telles — I think we have a new vandal here

Nearly all tihs user's edits so far (made in a short space of time, as shown by the fact that they have consecutive edit numbers) have been to change the top speeds of various cars (in the case of Lightning McQueen, he blundered by changing the MPH speed but neglecting to change the KPH to match, making the vandalism obvious). His other edit was to insert a foriegn (Spanish, I think) passage into the Raoul ÇaRoule article. I think action needs to be taken. — RobertATfm (talk) 10:09, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

Interesting, hard to tell if it's vandalism or just someone with incorrect information. For now let's keep an eye on it. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 12:49, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

He has today inserted this false information a third time with no explanation or citing of a source. Once may have been a mistake; three times, in a short period and in the light of being reverted every time, is more likely to be vandalism. In any case, I have checked and the "124.3 mph" figure is believable as it's an accurate conversion of 200 km/h; "336.3 mph" sounds like a figure plucked out of the air (can any race car really go that fast?). — RobertATfm (talk) 16:03, February 5, 2017 (UTC)

I blocked him for 2 weeks and left him a message. Thanks for the heads up! --Jeff (talk) 16:37, February 5, 2017 (UTC)

Improved(?) "Delete" template

As you have probably already seen, I have created a new "X-Delete" template to add the "date" parameter which in my opinion is sadly lacking in the present Delete template. I have designed this to be backwards compatible with the existing template, and even to look like it as much as possible.

If you and the other two admins agree that this version should go live, perhaps one of you could replace the existing template with the new one. — RobertATfm (talk) 12:04, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

I copied over your changes to the standard Delete template, looks good, thanks. --Jeff (talk) 12:48, January 30, 2017 (UTC)

Bad images

All four of these have been uploaded with a spurious .JXR (Microsoft enhanced JPEG image, apparently) extension, making them unusable on this wiki. I have downloaded the first and renamed it to remove the extension, and with that done it is recognised by my computer as a PNG (something to do with Toy Story 3). These images need to be renamed, or perhaps deleted if they are not useful. — RobertATfm (talk) 22:48, February 8, 2017 (UTC)

I just deleted them, plus hopefully all the other recent images you've marked for deletion. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 02:06, February 9, 2017 (UTC)

Another vandal?

User:JillianK1 has created a nonsense page about a movie supposedly "coming" in 2026 (from the title it sounds like one of Aesop's Fables or at any rate that kind of story), and edited the "Movies" page accordingly, even though there are no movies currently in that category past 2019. This gave her three edits, which allowed her to vandalise the main page by adding a list of nonexistent "movies". (I thought a user needed more edits than that to become "established"? I would think "established user" status should require a minimum of 20 edits, and two weeks' editing; perhaps this is something for Wikia staff to look into?) I have of course reverted the edits and slapped a "delete" notice on the new page. (Which is another thing; I think the "candidates for deletion" category is long overdue for a mass purge, there's a script on the Developers' Wiki to do this.) — RobertATfm (talk) 23:16, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I did block the user and remove the fake movie page. I don't know what, if any, restrictions we have on editing the main page, definitely something we could look at, but the rate of vandalism is pretty low so I'm hesitant to do much at this time. Something to keep in the back of our minds though, thanks. --Jeff (talk) 23:25, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

Copyvio image

That image you deleted as a copyvio was uploaded again two minutes later. I think a block is in order. —RobertATfm (talk) 21:11, March 2, 2017 (UTC)

I may have been premature in deleting the image. I saw it had been uploaded but wasn't linked to any pages so I deleted it. I don't know the source of the image so thought it could be a copyright violation, but am not sure about that. As for the AC/DC page, I don't mind having it, I'm not fond of referencing a wikipedia page. BUT, if the content of the page isn't original (i.e. just copied from the wikipedia article), then yes, I see no reason to keep it. --Jeff (talk) 22:13, March 2, 2017 (UTC)

User:Green Hawk 2408

User:Green Hawk 2408 is a sockpuppet of User:Blue Diamond 2408; they have usernames on the same pattern, and both have inserted that rubbish about the evil cars in Cars 2 being "terrorists" instead of just criminals. I reverted the latter edits, and left a message on her talk page about it. This may be why she stopped editing under that name; but now her new one has been blocked, she may come back under the old one. Certainly, the first time could have been a mistake, but doing it again, after being informed of the error, is vandalism. — RobertATfm (talk) 17:21, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

Yea, I blocked the green hawk account this morning after seeing those identical changes again. I'm hoping they've gotten the message, but if they come back with the Blue Diamond account and make similar changes I won't hesitate to block that account. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 17:27, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

Don't block me out!

Don't block me out!

I promsied I'll never messing the edit pages ever again.

Cars 3 plot information

After you undid Phamandrew79's edit on the plot of Cars 3, Logan Greger has added a plotline about an hour later, and has even added it on the World of Cars Wiki's Cars 3 page. Should the information still be removed? If so, I think I shall remove it on the World of Cars Wiki (even though some of the character pages there already have spoilers because they contain information from the Cars 3 essential guide). --Lightening McQueen (talk) 23:50, June 15, 2017 (UTC)

Never mind. I realised that it must not even be June 16 in America yet compared to my country, so I've undid Logan Greger's edit on both wikis myself. --Lightening McQueen (talk) 23:55, June 15, 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the information. We shouldn't put add plot details until the film is officially released tomorrow, the 16th. --Jeff (talk) 00:23, June 16, 2017 (UTC)


Can we have a discord chat? CB2014 17:55, July 17, 2017 (UTC)

No! Please don't block me! That's not fair!


I'm sorry. It's okay if we type in when the actor played the character, right?

Unused images to be deleted.

These logo's should be deleted, they're poor quality and are no longer being used. Alpha Baymax 12:16, September 10, 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, they've been deleted. --Jeff (talk) 14:13, September 10, 2017 (UTC)

Winter Animals

TrueDarwinLaurentAguilarVegatheBest is vandalizing the Bruce page, please stop them.--Hulk10 (talk) 16:07, October 15, 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the page, I have blocked that user. --Jeff (talk) 16:49, October 15, 2017 (UTC)

Your welcome--Hulk10 (talk) 16:55, October 15, 2017 (UTC)

Hey thanks for deleting Delete Me it original potrayed this-

And they screen fake!!! Wave9Nut (talk) 05:28, November 21, 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I also deleted those images. --Jeff (talk) 05:45, November 21, 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Pixar France

Hi, I'm a administrator on Wiki Pixar France, can we be partners please?

Sorry if my english is bad. ;-(


Hello! This is not an area I'm very familiar with, but there are a couple of possibilities. The first would be adding interlanguage wiki links from pages on our wiki to the Pixar France wiki. I know User:Gray Catbird has added links to fr.pixar. Another option is to become an affiliate, you can visit Pixar Wiki:Affiliates to learn more about it. I hope this helps. --Jeff (talk) 15:14, January 11, 2018 (UTC)


He creates pages with fake names. Can you block him?

You know for sure these are fake names? They are characters in the films, right? I would expect them to be on the Cars 3 Die-Cast Line page then. --Jeff (talk) 15:21, January 18, 2018 (UTC)
I gave in now. Now I want investigate the deletion of Brian Spark. --Jose (User talk:Josejim1307) 17:02, January 20,2018(UTC)

Brian Spark

How come you deleted Brian Spark. It’s his real name, even the film gave him the name, Kaiser DeBreaks wasn’t the name given, so I wanted you to delete that post.

Brian Spark is not a character listed in the official press kit, and I don't see that character on the Cars 3 Die-Cast Line page. Please provide an official source of the character and image, like from a die cast or other merchandise, or a Pixar source. Also, please do not add information about being retired or fired, and what team they race for, unless there's some official reference for it. This site is for official information only; if you continue adding unofficial information you may be blocked. --Jeff (talk) 20:37, January 19, 2018 (UTC)

Brian Spark is there in world ofcars drive in wiki, here is the link.

Sorry, here is the link I am talking about,

Open wikis, by their very nature, cannot be valid sources. — evilquoll (talk) 04:47, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
I didn’t create that page.
As User:Evilquoll pointed out, a wiki cannot be used as an official source. I looked at the page you referenced, and there are no official sources referenced on that page. I have no idea where the information in the History section came from, as for as I can tell it's completely fabricated and made up. I know very little about the World of Cars wiki, but on this wiki we have a strict policy on official information only. If you can provide an official reference for this material, whether from die-casts, books, etc, then it can be allowed. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 05:35, January 20, 2018 (UTC)

Here is a photo of Brian Spark’s diecast with a packet. It has his name below in a small font. I think the pitcure was given through a link.

And I think that he was left by mistake in Cars 3 Die-Cast Line page as sometimes, some pieces of information are left out in some pages, that’s why, so I have proven Brian Spark is the real name of the Leak Less veteran in Cars 3.

Could I add him there.

User:FreddieMiller6 added Brian Spark

I added him with official source FreddieMiller6 (talk) 14:20, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
Yes, this is official and the page can stay. But, please be careful of your other edits. You're still adding information about characters being fired or retired or replaced. There is no official proof of this type of information. I've had to revert your recent changes because of these types of changes. This is your last warning, you will be blocked for at least a week if you continue making these types of edits. Also, you should spend time learning some common wiki editing etiquette, like leaving your signature when you write on talk pages, putting the film name in italics, etc. --Jeff (talk) 15:33, January 20, 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Pixar French

Hi, I'm a administrator on WIki Pixar French. I need help for builmd the wiki? Can you speak French and help me?

Plume de Flocon (talk) 18:37, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately I don't speak french. --Jeff (talk) 18:43, January 29, 2018 (UTC)

Vandal image uploading

User Jeff Doe has twice vandalised logo images by uploading the wrong logo (since reverted by another user). — evilquoll (talk) 20:20, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. Let's keep an eye on this user for any further changes, and I'll take action if necessary. --Jeff (talk) 20:25, February 9, 2018 (UTC)


Recently, Clue's Room, apparently a second account created by Superball shoes, has renamed the Cars 2: The Video Game page back to that title with a racist word. However, I can't rename it back. Could you please sort it out and remove that offensive redirect afterwards? --Lightening McQueen (talk) 00:29, February 15, 2018 (UTC)

File:Cars jacob logo.jpg

For some reason, this file has attracted a stream of editors whose sole contribution to this wiki is to make a nonsense edit to this file. I think it's time to protect this image to stop this — especially as the latest idiotor has uploaded another copy under the filename File:Cars Mike logo.jpg, and his edit was to link the original to the copy. — evilquoll (talk) 08:25, February 28, 2018 (UTC)

I don't get it, I don't see that this file is even needed? Can I just delete it? I did delete Cars Mike logo.jpg. --Jeff (talk) 13:51, February 28, 2018 (UTC)

User: Lady Claire 99

Has not only re-created the page "Gilbert (Finding Nemo)", but has removed the deletion notice from it without any attempt to discuss the matter. — evilquoll (talk) 10:00, April 15, 2018 (UTC)

Yea, I blocked the user and left a note asking for an official source for the information. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 14:10, April 15, 2018 (UTC)

Foreign Dub Actors category

Why did you delete the Foreign Dub Actors category?

We do not use a lot of categories on this wiki, it should be sufficient to just use the regular Actor categories. --Jeff (talk) 14:12, May 22, 2018 (UTC)


Hey, Jeff. Did you happen to see the message on my talk page regarding Discussions? I don't really know what much about it. What do you think? Thanks! - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 01:23, June 8, 2018 (UTC)

Hey Ryan, I probably know as much about discussions and forums as you do. After I got your message, I did some research (which has totaled less than 5 minutes, call me an expert now :). It doesn't look like we have the predecessor of Discussions (Forum Boards) even enabled, so I guess we're way behind the times. In theory, I like the idea of having forums or discussions, and I'd love to participate in them. But, with all the issues we've had with antagonists, villains, etc, I just feel if we enable discussions we'll end up with a bunch of arguments about things like that. And I don't know about you, but I don't have a lot of time right now to monitor them. To have successful discussions I think we'd need some solid contributors willing to start good topics and engage others in them. I'm within a year of semi-retirement, and at that time I'd hope to have more free time to spend on fun things like this, but until then I won't have time to devote to it. --Jeff (talk) 02:00, June 8, 2018 (UTC)
OK, thanks. So we'll just delay it for the time-being then. Thanks! - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 12:53, June 8, 2018 (UTC)

Pizza Planet Truck in Incredibles 2

I just put the image of the Pizza Planet Truck in Incredibles 2, but i kinda messed up when i added it. i messed the Video game Appearances part on it. can you fix that please? also yes, that's where the truck is in the Second film Jamestheawesomefool13 (talk) 03:50, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

OK, I fixed it. The main issue was that the closing gallery element got removed. Somehow the link to the Incredibles Video Game also got changed, so I fixed that too. You can look at the history of the page and then compare your last edit with my edit to see the changes I made to fix the page - this will help you understand what I did. Thanks for adding the image! --Jeff (talk) 04:32, June 20, 2018 (UTC)

User:Paige EM again

After an 18-month absence, she is back again and up to her old tricks; she has uploaded a number of Wreck-it Ralph videos, and a fanon Planes/Star Wars crossover. — evilquoll (talk) 05:08, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. The videos have been deleted and the user permanently blocked. --Jeff (talk) 12:36, June 21, 2018 (UTC)

Blue's Clues edit warring again

User:Tienle71 is insisting that the man at the beginning of Up, who bears a vague resemblance to Steve Burns, is Steve Burns; he has reverted my removal of this statement, and then reinstated it again after I removed it again despite my telling him of this wiki's strict no-fanon policy. He also insists that there is another such reference in Toy Story 3.

It looks like admin action is required here. — evilquoll (talk) 06:38, June 23, 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I've left a message on his talk page, hopefully the behavior will change but if not I'll take further action. --Jeff (talk) 13:47, June 23, 2018 (UTC)

A Warning or block might be needed

This person has only added bad things about black people to some articles here. I think they might need to be warned or blocked. Juganna (talk) 00:04, July 4, 2018 (UTC)

Yes, thank you for the note and repairing the vandalism. The user has been blocked. --Jeff (talk) 01:12, July 4, 2018 (UTC)


Tow Mater isn’t bisexual, transgender or homosexual! He’s straight because he loves and respects women but he mostly loves Holley Shiftwell! From CarsFan3

Yep, I agree with you. And no one said that he was any of those things. And just because he wore a hula girl outfit doesn't mean he is bisexual, transgender or homosexual, it just means it was a costume. Nothing wrong with that. Thanks.
I'd like to say, it's obvious you're a big fan of Mater and have a deep passion for him, and that's awesome! But realize that this wiki is meant for official facts. Someone like you, who likes Mater so much, you might want to investigate or utilize just your talk page or the blog feature of the wiki to write about Mater. There may also be other wikis that allow editors to explore their opinions and passions more. Don't be upset if we have to revert an edit you make - we are just doing our job keeping opinions out of the wiki and just keeping it to the facts. I hope this makes sense! Dad gum! :) --Jeff (talk) 21:46, August 9, 2018 (UTC)

Would you like to check out my blog post i made?

Shrekyardigans (talk) 17:54, August 14, 2018 (UTC)

Incredibles tv series blog post

Would you like to check out my blog post i made?

Shrekyardigans (talk) 17:54, August 14, 2018 (UTC)

Hey, excellent post! I liked your villain names. I think there is a lot of potential for an Incredibles related TV series, would love to see that. Maybe with Disney's new streaming service coming next year they'll add some Pixar shows! --Jeff (talk) 18:05, August 14, 2018 (UTC)

Official sources

Here are my official sources:

Can you undo all of your reverts? --Emperor Nathan (talk) 21:30, September 3, 2018 (UTC)

Hi, after looking more closely at those articles, I wouldn't consider any of them to be official. Plus, some are dated over 2 years ago, before the last change to writer and director. What we need to see is the press release from Disney that states the voice cast. I wouldn't expect this for a few more months. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 15:34, September 4, 2018 (UTC)

Edit revert

Why did you revert my edits? I have official sources for these:

--Emperor Nathan (talk) 16:19, September 24, 2018 (UTC)

These articles were written years ago, before the latest writer and director changes. It's very possible that due to story changes those characters won't be in the final film. This is very similar to The Good Dinosaur, and how many of the original characters and actors didn't make it to the final incarnation of the film. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 17:30, September 24, 2018 (UTC)

What are you doing—The preceding unsigned comment was added by FrankieCT (talkcontribs) 22:21, September 24, 2018 (UTC).

Cam/Cameron Spinner

Recently, Lorenzo0827 has renamed Cam Spinner's page to "Cameron Spinner" and replaced "Cam" with "Cameron" everywhere else on the page. I don't even believe there are any official sources saying he was called "Cameron". Can you please rename the page back to "Cam Spinner". Because it'll only let admins rename it. --Lightening McQueen (talk) 21:22, October 1, 2018 (UTC)

There is now edit warring going on regarding this page; the user has redone the edit changing "Cam" to "Cameron". And although I haven't yet seen Cars 3, to my mind "Cam Spinner" makes a lot more sense than "Cameron Spinner", as the former is a meaningful/punny name (like "Evelyn Deavor") whereas the latter is bland and boring. — evilquoll (talk) 23:42, October 1, 2018 (UTC)
I've renamed the page and un-did the most recent edits. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 23:45, October 1, 2018 (UTC)

Steve Burns in UP

It wasn't the beginning of UP! You have to know the right truth! The man refrenceing Steve Burns wasn't in the beginning of the movie UP! It was the scene when the house starting flying up & the man seeing the house at a shop. There's Your Proof!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Andrew Huy99 (talkcontribs) 04:55, October 10, 2018‎ (UTC).

Yes, we all know by now that a man bearing some resemblance to Steve Burns appears in the scene you mention. However, without an official source (someone actually in Pixar stating "we based this character on Steve Burns"), the appearance of this character "proves" nothing; the resemblance remains speculation, and likely coincidence. — evilquoll (talk) 08:18, October 10, 2018 (UTC)

Mr. Potato Head - TS4 Actor

Potato Head's new voice actor was confirmed by IGN here: Jackstanbrah (talk) 11:51, November 14, 2018 (UTC)

I haven't found any other sources that say Tudyk will be the new voice, including many of the sites that posted the latest TS4 trailers. I think IGN is incorrect, but if you find any other sources confirming it let me know. --Jeff (talk) 02:29, November 15, 2018 (UTC)

EVE and the plasma gun.

I do not think there is any solid proof that she has control of the power of her gun. And if she had common sense and had control, she would have made her gun more powerful to defeat all Stewards, rather than just one at a time.


True, but there is also nothing that says she doesn't have that type of control. My point is that it can't be called a mistake. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 18:25, December 27, 2018 (UTC)

I still would find it odd that she would want to destroy only one Steward at a time rather than all at once.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by GabuTheWolf54 (talkcontribs) 18:56, December 27, 2018 (UTC).

Because such a large blast would also have caused significant damage to the Axiom? Possibly even breaching the hull, which is not a good idea on a starship in deep space. — evilquoll (talk) 07:24, January 14, 2019 (UTC)

Pictures of Carol Taylor

Have any photos of her??? User:And Davis (Unsigned)

No, who is she? What source do you have she will be in Toy Story 4? You must provide official source, IMDb is not sufficient. --Jeff (talk) 17:28, January 12, 2019 (UTC)

Response to your revert message on Adult Humor

I don't have a problem with it being uncensored myself and I really only did it for consistency. However, the term "bugger" can be considered a profanity in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth countries (like Australia where I live) so if it does need to be censored, that would be the reason. I'm not gonna try and censor it again though since I really only tried to make it consistent. Jack%27sAvatar.pngThe Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 04:29, January 14, 2019 (UTC)

A lot of words can be profane in some cultures but not others, and this varies across time as well as across space. For instance, "crap" was never a swear word when I grew up in 1960s Britain, but it is (at least for some people) now, probably resulting from a back-association with Victorian plumbers' merchant Thomas Crapper and the product line for which he is most famous. Amusingly, I have seen posts from the Americans (including one on this wiki) blaming the British for this language shift, and British posts blaming the Americans. — evilquoll (talk) 07:33, January 14, 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments guys! --Jeff (talk) 13:36, January 14, 2019 (UTC)

Proper delete nominations vs. vandal ones

Just now, there was a delete nomination done in the vandal way (blanking the page, giving no reason for the tag). As this looks to have been an honest mistake, I won't name and shame the user; but the incident, one which I have seen far too many times on different wikis, prompted me to write a blog post on the subject. Perhaps this post should be mentioned in the policies? — evilquoll (talk) 08:49, January 15, 2019 (UTC)

I agree, the user was doing the right thing reverting the vandal's edits. It looks like his only "error" was wiping out the page and not giving a delete reason. But because he was doing the right thing (just maybe going around it the wrong way) definitely puts it above being a vandal itself. I wouldn't want to frighten users and causing them not to help out because they think they may be accused of vandalism. I agree, we should give proper delete reasons, and I think your blog post has good information that can go into a wiki policy. I'm going to be out of town for a couple of weeks starting later this week but should be able to write up a new policy either before I leave, or if not, when I get back. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 13:43, January 15, 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for blocking.

Thanks a whole lot for blocking juvenile Franciswickersham316. Really. Cannot be happier or more relieved.

GabuTheWolf54 (talk) 22:40, January 19, 2019 (UTC)GabuTheWolf54

Actually I didn't block him this time, another administrator blocked him across all of wikia. This user has vandalized the site before, and I assume it will happen again. If that happens, please do not write on the user's talk page or in any way acknowledge the user - this just gives them the attention they are seeking and encourages them to do more. The best thing to do is ignore them. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 22:45, January 19, 2019 (UTC)

                 That makes lots of sense, thank you anywho.

GabuTheWolf54 (talk) 22:56, January 19, 2019 (UTC)GabuTheWolf54

Disneysaurus is back

Now posting as User:Yankovie, and still obsessively flogging his nonsense about how Disney is supposedly "forbidden" to pay tribute to other companies' works. (He must never have seen Wreck-It Ralph, with its dozens of homages to classic video games and their characters; if he ever does, it will probably send him into apoplexy or catatonia.) Please, ban him and delete his latest rubbish. — evilquoll (talk) 02:09, February 2, 2019 (UTC)

I will be leaving him a comment on his talk page shortly. I am yet unsure how to deal with his blog post. I realize he is completely wrong in his blog post, but the point of blog posts are to allow users to express opinions, even if we know them to be false and nonfactual. Since it is meant to be related to Disney/Pixar (unlike the other blog post you tagged for deletion and I removed earlier today), I am leaning towards just leaving it alone. I would recommend not engaging the user in discussion on the blog post, as I don't see anything you say, or any proof you give, will convince him to change his thoughts. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 03:52, February 2, 2019 (UTC)


Although this appears to be a legitimate image file, and it indeed is being used, the name is far too long; I suspect this was deliberate. I think this image needs to be moved to a more descriptive name (I think only admins can rename images), and it is probably time that the Draft Image Policy was made official. — evilquoll (talk) 18:32, February 11, 2019 (UTC)

Yes, that's an annoying name! I've changed it. I'll also take a look at your image policy, thanks! --Jeff (talk) 18:39, February 11, 2019 (UTC)
I just published your image policy, thanks for writing it up! I did some minor editing but feel free to update it as necessary. I think it will automatically show up in the wiki policy navigation, but I don't remember if there's something I need to edit to make that happen. --Jeff (talk) 02:57, February 13, 2019 (UTC)

Problem user

User:Qifhnvakflsnvieqkfhanofidslvkfsahdnv looks to be a vandalism-only account; he(?) has uploaded a video (a fanon video claiming to be an "official" Sesame Street video) and a photograph, which either is badly cropped or was badly composed to begin with, and has no relevance to this wiki that I know of. Also created a Sesame Street page which could hve been relevant (Pixar did produce a few shorts for that show), but has nonsensical contents (I think it should be deleted, and if need be recreated from scratch), and then moved that page to PyschoPieO, showing that it was never intended to be an on-topic page. Has also twice removed the delete tag from that page without the proper discussion. — evilquoll (talk) 21:51, February 11, 2019 (UTC)

The idiot also vandalised my user page. Definitely needs the boot. — evilquoll (talk) 21:54, February 11, 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up, I've blocked this user plus 2 others for adding garbage to the Monsters University character pages. Hopefully I've deleted the bad images/videos. --Jeff (talk) 02:26, February 12, 2019 (UTC)

Bad image name

File:Images.jpeg is proof positive of why an image policy would be a good idea; a name like that practically invites careless overwriting, and this has indeed happened, several times. — evilquoll (talk) 21:57, February 11, 2019 (UTC)


Hi, Jeff, my is name Harold and I have noticed there was such a huge mistake you made, and it's that you reverted my edits on the page called The Underminer. I'll explain why.

I'm aware that there's a rule on this wiki saying that antagonist categories and antagonist fussing is not allowed and I'm aware that the Primary Villains category is the only antagonist/villain category that is allowed. But, the Underminer should be added to the Primary Villains category for the following reasons:

For starters, I'm aware that the Underminer is a minor antagonist in The Incredbles 1 and The Incredibles 2, but he is the main antagonist of the Incredibles video game called The Rise of The Underminer. TheSuperGenius (talk) 02:59, March 8, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment and thoughts. I'm very glad you've read our wiki policies, thank you! Video games are third party works and not the primary work of Pixar. The primary villain category is only for those works done directly by Pixar, so the feature films, short films, TV specials. Thanks again! --Jeff (talk) 03:18, March 8, 2019 (UTC)

Yet more edit warring

User:Esbonl is repeatedly claiming that the Pizza Planet Truck could be in The Incredibles, despite everything we know (including the fact that claimed "sightings" are invariably too vague/blurred to be verifiable), and even in the light of being reverted by RaptorWiki. It would appear that further intervention is needed. — evilquoll (talk) 23:26, March 8, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, the user has been warned. --Jeff (talk) 00:23, March 9, 2019 (UTC)

PP truck in The Incredibles - source

Since you didn't reply on my talk page, I'm asking you again here: can you provide the source do the claim that "both director Brad Bird and Lee Unkrich confirmed that the pizza planet truck does not show up in The Incredibles"? - Esbonl (talk) 21:45, March 12, 2019 (UTC)

This is well known information so no, I'm not going to go back through the director's commentary, old interviews, etc, to find the information. --Jeff (talk) 22:01, March 12, 2019 (UTC)

Jacob Williamson

FYI, user Jacob Williamson created a lot of fanon pages and images. I've marked some of the pages for deletion, but might want to check his contributions page to make sure you delete all the pages and images. Thanks in advance. Magitroopa (talk) 09:54, March 18, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, the user has been blocked. --Jeff (talk) 13:33, March 18, 2019 (UTC)

Al McWhiggin

I still think it wrong to label Al the "secondary" antagonist as his actions have far more influence on the events of the plot than those of Stinky Pete. He should at least be called the "central" antagonist. This does not require relegating Stinky Pete to secondary villain status. The "central" and "main" antagonist are not necessarily the same person. As an analogy, one might argue that Saruman is the main villain of Lord of the Rings, as he occupies the main spotlight of the drama. But the central villain is clearly Sauron himself, even though he barely appears. In both cases the central antagonist is ultimately responsible for the conflict driving the plot, while the main antagonist acts as the immediate vehicle of that conflict and so receives far more exposure. The labels "central" and "main" are used for those same characters over at the Disney Wiki. I propose that the same terms should be used here.
Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Artistsanomalous (talkcontribs) March 23, 2019, 23:02.

Thanks for expressing your opinion on the topic of Stinky Pete and Al McWhiggin. It's definitely a touchy subject, as can be seen by how many times these 2 characters have been edited and changed between primary and secondary antagonist or villain. Plus, we've discussed this topic pretty heavily on the Primary Villains talk page. This is why we've defined a "no antagonist fussing" wiki policy. So I really appreciate you bringing it up on my talk page rather than just charging ahead and making edits to the character pages! I'll be honest, I have a hard time seeing the difference between a central and a main antagonist, and I think that could lead to more confusion. But if you can clearly define these terms and their use, I'd suggest bringing it up on the villains talk page mentioned above to get other people's feedback. Thanks again! --Jeff (talk) 23:15, March 23, 2019 (UTC)


Franciswickersham350 needs a blocking. Changing pages relating to "Monsters" or "Monsters Inc." or "Monsters University" to monkeys. Thanks in advance. Magitroopa (talk) 17:25, March 31, 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, the user has been blocked. --Jeff (talk) 17:33, March 31, 2019 (UTC)

Pay Uploads

I remember when I uploaded a video of "The Adventures of André & Wally B." onto this wiki and you took it as a copyright violation. I found pay uploads of Pixar shorts on YouTube (the ones you need to pay to watch) and was wondering whether or not those are allowed.

PurpleParrots7 (talk) 23:44, April 1, 2019 (UTC)

No, if you have to pay to view them, then they can't be used on the wiki. --Jeff (talk) 03:51, April 2, 2019 (UTC)
I totally agree with this; generally speaking, if a resource is not available to all users, it's not wiki material. For this reason, I yesterday deleted a video from the DreamWorks wiki (because it is watchable in the USA only), and today edited the Lightning McQueen article to replace a reference with an equivalent which doesn't try to force me to turn off my ad-blocker (if you don't like my using an ad-blocker, don't run ads). — evilquoll (talk) 07:21, April 2, 2019 (UTC)


I feel so bad for always posting different people to 'report' them on your talk page, but I think this user's edits are self explanatory. Magitroopa (talk) 19:30, April 4, 2019 (UTC)

No need to feel bad, I'm glad you noticed it and informed me, plus fixed the vandalism. I've blocked the user, oops, I mean user and sock puppets. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 19:37, April 4, 2019 (UTC)

Riley's First Date

What do you think of Riley's First Date?

What do you think of Riley's First Date?

Jesse Nangle 16 (talk) 05:29, April 9, 2019 (UTC)

Jesse Nangle 16

I like it, thanks. Note, we do not use generic categories on this wiki. We also don't put a location category on a character page. Please refer to our wiki policies. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 14:24, April 9, 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Manager

Hi Dvcnut! My name's Chris, and I’m the Fandom Wiki Manager for Pixar Wiki!

I'm here to help the community and be a liaison to full-time Fandom staff. If you ever have a question or issue relating to the wiki, editing, etc., please contact me on my talk page.

Super excited for Toy Story 4 this year, been a fan of Toy Story my entire life! More users will come here when Toy Story 4 releases, if you need a hand with anything please let me know. :) --Spongebob456 talk 11:58, May 19, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the info and offer of help, I appreciate it! --Jeff (talk) 13:43, May 19, 2019 (UTC)
No problem! :) --Spongebob456 talk 14:57, May 19, 2019 (UTC)

Incredibles 2 success!

Hi Dvcnut! Elsa and I messaged RaptorWiki with questions and suggestions about Toy Story 4 coming up and the exciting times for the wiki. They asked us to message you about it, would you mind reading the thread please, and perhaps respond here? Thanks! :) --Spongebob456 talk 13:05, May 31, 2019 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reaching out. As you've noticed, we haven't enabled discussions or even forums. I think part of this (at least for me) is a lack of knowledge of those features. But also is the limited amount of admin time RaptorWiki and I have had for the wiki, and I worry that these will increase the time I need to spend monitoring the wiki. I feel we have very little "drama" here on the wiki (and therefore not much required time commitment) and I think most of that is the lack of discussion boards.
I also question whether a discussion feature would be useful or well used on this wiki. We have built this wiki for official Pixar information only, and so topics like Pixar fan theories, suggestions for future films, etc, are not allowed except for user blogs. We've had to block users who violate the "only official information" policy. I don't see much activity with user blogs, and what I do see seems to be mostly people arguing about Jurassic Park references in Pixar films! While discussions would give these users another outlet to explore and discuss topics (like fan theories, etc), I'm concerned that will filter into the regular wiki pages, again, leading to additional monitoring and management.
Finally, I may be wrong but I think discussions would probably work well with moderators who could start discussions, launch polls, etc. Neither RaptorWiki or I have the time to do that.
With all of that, I'd be willing to at least try enabling discussions and see what happens, as long as it's clear it's just a trial and could be disabled at any time. With Toy Story 4 coming out right around the corner it's a good time to try it. Hopefully enabling and disabling the feature is fairly simple? How would it be visible to wiki users? I think adding a link under the Community tab would be good, and/or adding it to the Special:Community page. It looks like users can report spam and inappropriate content - as an admin would I be notified in these cases? Is there something I need to do to get those notifications?
Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 21:38, May 31, 2019 (UTC)
Hi! That's totally fine and I can understand your concerns. I've been there before where you are almost scared to activate a new feature for fear it will worsen the experience on the community. That's a normal response, don't worry! That's what I'm here for, to help you through these steps to positive outcomes.
That brings me on to the point about growth on the wiki. I understand your point about bringing in more users may create more drama, but that can also work on the flipside though as the more you grow the community, the more awesome users join to help you out. This means you have more contenders to be admins, content moderators, rollbacks etc along side you! :)
So if the fanon content does filter onto article pages, you'll have more users and eventually admins who can monitor that and help out.
With Discussions concerns, there are a group of users called 'Global Discussion Moderators' who can monitor Discussions with you to keep it clean of spam. While enabling discussions as a trial isn't possible, it shouldn't be needed as Discussions will be well moderated and will be popular among community members. :)
More information on Discussions can be found here and they're located on the right-hand side of the wiki navigation. Take a look at an example on the Star Wars wiki if you are interested! Any user can start a poll on Discussions, so no need to worry about mod input.
Discussions is also a compulsory feature if you want to be included on the Fandom app. The app is a really cool way of discussing a topic and browsing the wiki on a mobile device - check it out here!
Hopefully this helps! :) --Spongebob456 talk 11:33, June 1, 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Is this okay? Would you be open to me enabling Discussions? :) --Spongebob456 talk 18:55, June 2, 2019 (UTC)
Yes, you can enable it. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 19:41, June 2, 2019 (UTC)
Great! So I've just enabled Discussions, feel free to have a play around with them. For your concern about spam in Discussions, do you know of any users on Pixar Wiki who would be open to being a Discussions moderator for Discussions to help clear up any spam?
Either way, we can have a Global Discussions Moderator check the Discussions here to make sure they are well moderated. Does this sound okay? :)
Without meaning to overload you with information (please tell me if I am!) there is another feature designed to help mobile users called the Mobile Main Page. This feature creates an organised main page design for mobile devices and is curated by wiki admins. This will not affect the design of your current desktop main page, and will be a great way to draw mobile users in. Would you be open to me making a start on this and then showing you what it would look like? :) --Spongebob456 talk 18:58, June 3, 2019 (UTC)
I don't have anyone at the moment interested in being a moderator. I'm hoping as an Admin I am automatically a moderator, or is there something I need to do to enable that? Sure, having a global moderator would be great, thanks.
As for the mobile main page, that would be great. I've been looking at the Star Wars wiki, both within the Fandom app and the website (both the desktop and mobile versions). To be honest, I don't understand the desktop view of the site, and really like the layout of the mobile site and the Fandom app wiki view - looks like it's organized by categories that I would expect - films, television, etc. For the Pixar wiki, I would want it in one of two ways. First, I like the design of our Desktop view and so could see the Fandom app being similar with something like the desktop main column: Feature Films, then Upcoming Films, Short Films, etc. Another possible way would be more like the Star Wars design by categories - Feature Films, Shorts, Characters, Actors. Hope this makes sense, thanks. --Jeff (talk) 20:36, June 3, 2019 (UTC)
Hi! As an admin you do automatically get moderator rights, but it is also sometimes useful to have dedicated Discussions moderators to moderate to free up time for you to handle the content side. I'll get in touch with staff to arrange Global Discussion Moderator support, no problem!
Your mobile main page would look exactly like Star Wars wiki's does, but yours will be curated to Pixar wiki's needs. So we would include categories specific to this wiki to make it nice and easy for users to navigate to articles they want. I'll make a start on the mobile main page using your criteria to give you an idea of what it would look like, and before we know it, it'll be complete in no time!
Once the mobile main page is finished and, now that Discussions is enabled, we can put you forward to be featured on the Fandom app. Exciting times! :) --Spongebob456 talk 18:06, June 4, 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I looked for our wiki in the app and didn't see it today. Maybe the mobile main page has to be complete before the community is available in the app? --Jeff (talk) 18:41, June 4, 2019 (UTC)
No problem! The process works by checking a wiki meets the criteria to be included on the Fandom app, such as having a curated mobile main page and Discussions enabled. Once both of those criteria are fulfilled, I forward this wiki to Fandom staff responsible for the app who doublecheck the wiki meet the requirements and then proceed to add it to the app. Hopefully that makes sense.
Just a heads up, we are having some issues with wiki permissions in me editing the mobile main page, hopefully those can be fixed soon so I can work on it. If you would like to have a go at editing it now, go right ahead. More details on the app can be found here and I can offer help with editing it from here until I get the permissions to access it.
Do you have Discord at all? That would be a great way to contact me as well. I can be found there at Spongebob456#7402. :) 18:59, June 4, 2019 (UTC)
Yep, that makes sense. If I get some time I'll take a look at the help page and see what I can do, probably won't be until late today (unlikely) or tomorrow at the earliest. No Discord account, haven't needed one, will think about it. --Jeff (talk) 19:06, June 4, 2019 (UTC)
All good, if you have any questions about mobile main page (MMP), Discord or anything please let us know. I'll hopefully get back to you ASAP on the MMP once permissions are sorted out. :) --Spongebob456 talk 19:14, June 4, 2019 (UTC)
Hi! I'm jumping in to let you know that Fandom would like to offer you cinema tickets for Toy Story 4, to thank you for all your great work. All I need from you is an email address and the movie theater and time you would like to go to in advance, so I can send you the tickets. You can email me at Let me know if you're interested :) Hypsoline (talk) 08:47, June 5, 2019 (UTC)
Of course I'm interested, thank you so much!! I'll get an email off to you shortly. Just to make sure I understand, do you need to know a specific date and showtime? Thanks again! --Jeff (talk) 18:34, June 5, 2019 (UTC)
Not that I will probably be of much help, since I am so very busy, but I have added Jeff and Spongebob to discord as well. I am raptor0192#1998. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 18:50, June 11, 2019 (UTC)


Hello! I'm Peony, an admin on the newly-created Onward Wiki. Would you possibly be interested in affiliating this wiki with the Onward Wiki? It's still small, as I've only just started expanding it, and there isn't much information about it out there yet, but hopefully soon it'll be bigger. And I understand if you'd rather not, of course. :) {{SUBST:User:Pinkpeony73/Sig}} 16:09, June 2, 2019 (UTC)

Hi Peony! Please take a look at our Affiliates page, I think that will help! --Jeff (talk) 19:39, June 2, 2019 (UTC)
Okay, thanks! {{SUBST:User:Pinkpeony73/Sig}} 21:00, June 2, 2019 (UTC)

Global Discussions Moderator

Hello! I’m Ursuul, a member of the Global Discussions Moderator team here to help manage Discussions for you for the next few months, per the conversation above. I’ve already taken the liberty to establish a mockup of Discussions Categories I think will be likely to see use, but if you would prefer a different set then by all means feel free to delete, add, & rearrange to your heart’s content; it’s easy to do at this early stage with few posts.

You should feel welcome to get involved & take command as you wish, but if not then I am perfectly capable of handling everything for you. If you like, you’re welcome to set up some Discussions Guidelines that you’d want me to enforce, although I can write them myself using my best judgment if you’d rather go full AUTO 😛

It will be my pleasure to hopefully field new Moderators & perhaps even train new editors for this Wiki, & to make sure that Discussions is an asset to you & this Wiki rather than a detriment. Good day!
UrsuulTalkGDMDate10:15 AM Wednesday, June 5, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the assistance! The current guidelines look good to start with. Thanks again! --Jeff (talk) 21:07, June 5, 2019 (UTC)

Preparing for Toy Story 4

Hi again! We're making great progress so far. With Toy Story 4 releasing super soon, it's important we carry on making progress to attract as many users as possible here and to make life easy for them.

I think we need to be featuring Toy Story 4 more prominently to make the most out of its release. To begin with, I would temporarily put Toy Story 4 first into your wiki's navigation after 'Universe' and put content related to the movie under the Characters, Movies etc headings. This will improve SEO (the search ranking for your wiki) so will draw in viewers to view quality Toy Story 4 content in time for the movie. After a month or so after release, you are free to move it in navigation. :)

Secondly, on your main page, it's important to feature Toy Story 4 first in your slider to promote the movie and, again, to draw viewers to the Toy Story 4 content which you've been working hard on.

I think the community also needs to be focusing efforts on character articles in particular, especially Bo Peep, given her return to the franchise (after 24 years!).

If you need help from Fandom's Content Team on this, please let us know!

Have you had any more thoughts about Discord? That would really help speed up the communication process. :) --Spongebob456 talk 17:45, June 6, 2019 (UTC)

I've create a Toy Story 4 top-level navigation link. It looks like there are some very small limits to how many entries can be in the navigation lists. I've also made the TS4 link first in the main page slider.
But as you point out, yes, now that we have Toy Story 4 prominently displayed, it becomes obviously clear the associated pages are low on content. Usually pages get filled out more once the film is released, since we don't allow unofficial information, rumors, speculation, etc, and we don't allow spoilers until the release date. But hopefully people will pitch in and add what is known to the pages.
I created a discord account and hopefully added you as a friend. I am dvcnut#5045. --Jeff (talk) 22:31, June 6, 2019 (UTC)
Great work! These changes should really help with the user experience.
Absolutely, I get what you mean about content after the movie releases. I think that if we can keep these character articles up-to-date with even information from the trailers, this will generate hype for the movie and will encourage the users to revisit the articles once they've seen the movie.
People will pitch in to help and if we can make the reader experience as good as can be for the wiki, then these readers are likely to become editors to help out.
I got your from request on Discord and I added you, that'll be a great way to reach me if you want to live chat and resolve any questions you have quickly. :)
I'll have some more ways to bring in contributors soon, stay tuned! --Spongebob456 talk 20:57, June 7, 2019 (UTC)
I added you as a friend on Discord as well Dvcnut. We should create a server to coordinate our efforts. Also, have you received my email about the movie tickets? I need an answer very soon. Finally, I also need to talk to both of you about a contest idea I have. And great news for all the changes you made, it will help a lot. Hypsoline (talk) 10:16, June 11, 2019 (UTC)
Yep, saw your invite and accepted it, thanks. Also responded to your email about the tickets. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 15:03, June 11, 2019 (UTC)

Mobile Main Page

I added content in the Mobile Main Page, you can have a look. It was not enough to request to be part of the Fandom App, now it should be. let me know what you think. You can update it whenever you want. Tip: Just fill out the Featured Content and Optional Categories sections, forget about the Featured Categories. Hypsoline (talk) 10:35, June 11, 2019 (UTC)

It looks good, thanks for filling it out more! --Jeff (talk) 15:02, June 11, 2019 (UTC)
You're welcome :) Hypsoline (talk) 15:55, June 11, 2019 (UTC)

It's me.

Portable infoboxes

Hi! So I have another recommendation in our efforts to prepare this wiki for the release of Toy Story 4. With Toy Story 4 releasing in a week or two, lots more users will be coming to the wiki so it would be a good idea to make the wiki as accessible as possible for users on a variety of devices, desktop and mobile.

Have you heard of or used Portable Infoboxes (PIs) before? They're really useful for users on mobile devices!

You're using them for some of your infoboxes at the moment (like here) but as a refresher, PIs are a type of infobox that are easier to code and also display better on mobile devices. This is very important as more people are using mobile devices and wikis need to do their best to accommodate those readers. PIs can be styled in a variety of ways and look great on both mobile and desktop devices.

For more details on PIs and portability, this is a great resource!

Your PIs at the moment use headings for the name, image, performer and appearances details. With the purpose of infoboxes being to provide key information about a character or movie, it would be good to include other aspects such as the personality of the character, physical characteristics, their friends/enemies etc. We would be able to assist you with editing the PIs to the wiki's needs and get them ready for the increased user traffic over the coming weeks.

What do you think? If you have any questions please let me know! :) --Spongebob456 talk 17:58, June 12, 2019 (UTC)

Seems to make sense. But looking at the help page and some of our main templates (Character, Film, Short), they all are using Infobox. Maybe I'm missing something but it looks like our content should be mostly good for mobile? --Jeff (talk) 01:27, June 13, 2019 (UTC)
Hi, yep! Most of it is good for mobile, but I'm also referring to having more fields in the infoboxes to include key details on Pixar content such as characters, movies, locations etc. A good example is the character infobox on the Kung Fu Panda wiki. Including more fields gives more key details for readers. How does that sound? :) --Spongebob456 talk 15:55, June 14, 2019 (UTC)
I don't have a problem expanding the fields. I see someone has done that recently to our Film template, and we've extended the super hero character template for The Incredibles, that's all good stuff. --Jeff (talk) 20:02, June 15, 2019 (UTC)


Wiki user Harrison123456 keeps making unneeded edits to the "Outtakes" wiki article and causing edit wars every time I reverted his unneeded edits. I left him a message about it, but he completely ignored me. Please kindly block him as long as you possibly can because he's obviously a troll. Thanks.

GrayWolf2 (talk) 08:08, June 21, 2019 (UTC)GrayWolf2

Gabby Gabby

Why did you undo my edit on the Gabby Gabby article? The character's main goal was more to get Woody's voicebox than to keep toys in her antique store. To say the latter was true seems misleading, as it makes her out to be villainous, when really she was just desperate to gain affection from the store owner's granddaugther. Woody even agrees to give Gabby his voicebox later in the film. 

Heghodge (talk) 22:46, June 26, 2019 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct. Thanks for asking me, I misread your edit and so removed it. I have hopefully put it back the way it was before (without the word former, which is what I was really trying to get rid of). Feel free to edit/change it if necessary! --Jeff (talk) 02:36, June 27, 2019 (UTC)

Rename request — image,jpg

This image illustrates the dangers of allowing such a generic file name to be used. It was first used in 2016 to upload an image which is claimed to be the Pizza Planet Truck in Finding Dory, and added to the PPT talk page; then, in February 2019, someone used the same file name to upload a LEGO Incredibles figure image. Since the latter was not used on any page that I know of, and it doesn't fit the usage of the original upload, I have reverted the image; but I think it needs to be renamed to something like "ppt-fd.jpg", and perhaps the original file name should be locked down to prevent further abuse. — evilquoll (talk) 03:38, June 29, 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I see that file has been renamed now 3 times. Thanks for flagging it, I have given it hopefully a more descriptive name. --Jeff (talk) 13:04, June 29, 2019 (UTC)

Please Block Fishtroop.

Hello, can you block Fishtroop due to vandalism and possbile sockpuppet?VideoGamer 234245 (talk) 04:46, July 9, 2019 (UTC)

Fishtroop is almost certainly a sock of already-blocked user Supahstah. Has already been blocked from the DreamWorks Wiki. — evilquoll (talk) 08:47, July 9, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, and cleaning up! The user has been blocked. --Jeff (talk) 12:16, July 9, 2019 (UTC)


Goldfishtroop is a sockpuppet of Supahstah , can you block him again.VideoGamer 234245 (talk) 18:19, July 10, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, the user has been blocked. --Jeff (talk) 18:50, July 10, 2019 (UTC)

Protect page Remy so only auto-confirmed users can edit it.

I found out that Supahstah and his sockpuppets are edit warring and changing its name over and over again, can you protect it so only auto-confirmed users can edit it?VideoGamer 234245 (talk) 19:18, July 11, 2019 (UTC)


Hello there! We've never met before but I've been a minor member of the wikia for a while. I noticed that another other user created this page Stewie Trivia with false information relating to some unknown thing that is apparently a "live-action/animation" movie. I doubt it was anything to do with Pixar. It all seems very fishy and I thought you might be able to look into it.

Also, I was aware that somebody was vandalizing the Luigi and Remy pages, and I was able to help out by fixing the pages today :)

The GTA Nerd (talk) 02:27, July 12, 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the note, I have removed the page and warned the user. Also, thanks much for your contributions and assistance with cleaning up those pages! --Jeff (talk) 03:03, July 12, 2019 (UTC)

Could you edit the page on the Disney Fandom site and edit the Toy Story 2 page on the Disney Fandom site and add "It was put into theatres on the film's theatrical release one month later (December 25th). The 2000 Widescreen DVD version has the original credits and the VHS and Fullscreen DVD Version and the 2010 DVD/Blu-ray release has the bloopers at the end credits. However the 2005 Special Edition DVD has the original credits, and the bloopers appear as a separate bonus feature. The 2019 UHD release uses the bloopers at the credits, but the clip of Prospector chatting with the Barbies in his box has been removed. It was also cut from the versions available digitally." Could you leave a message to gray wolf to unblock me so I can add and edit page on the Disney Fandom site...

User:Amee Jacobs

This user has done nothing but create tons of "foo/Transcript" pages, and corresponding categories, and all of those pages are blank placeholders (they say only "foo is a transcript"). In at least one case (WALL•E), the transcript page is IIRC a re-creation of content which was already created and deleted at least once before, and is pointless anyway as the main article already has a "Transcript" section. Looks like a massive clean-up is needed. — evilquoll (talk) 00:46, August 18, 2019 (UTC)

Ack! This is twice this user has done this. I blocked them this time, and will clean this up, my fault for not blocking after the first time it happened. --Jeff (talk) 01:03, August 18, 2019 (UTC)

Toy Story 4

How many mistakes are there in Toy Story 4?

Packers99 (talk) 14:07

I don't know the answer to that. Maybe once the blu-ray is out people will start listing them. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 02:14, August 19, 2019 (UTC)


Hi Dvcnut,

I'm TotallyLogical, an adminstrator from the Toy Story Wiki and we we're wondering if you would like to affiliate with us.

I have already placed your button on our site. Your Name: TotallyLogical Website URL: [1] Your Email: Message_Wall:TotallyLogical or DM on Discord (ThatLogicalGuy#8013) 100 x 50 Button: Toy Story 100x50 Affiliates Logo (hope I sized it right)

If you have any questions, let me know!

02:10, August 19, 2019 (UTC)
Hey TotallyLogical, thanks much! I've added your button to our affiliate page. --Jeff (talk) 02:23, August 19, 2019 (UTC)


Can you please block this user for a week, he is saying that Mr. Incredible is a protagonist when Elastigirl is the protagonist of Incredibles 2 when Mr. Incredible is the deuteragonist.VideoGamer 234245 (talk) 22:04, August 19, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the note and helping undo the edits. The user has been warned. If such behavior continues please let me know. Thanks again. --Jeff (talk) 22:24, August 19, 2019 (UTC)

Fishtroop strikes back.

This guy is back and me and antheor user is so sick of this can you block this account?


VideoGamer 234245 (talk) 23:20, August 27, 2019 (UTC)

Blank Pages

Hi Dvcnut,

There is a user by the name of User:1Zacharymonroe* who has been creating blank pages/pages without content on the wiki. Just wanted to let you know in case you wanted to delete them. Sense the user joined recently, I left a note on their talk page with some guidence on editing articles. If the pages are relevant, I might try to expand them later. Thank You!

Best Regards, Kevin TotallyLogicalTalk 17:23, September 12, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I believe this is a sock puppet for a previously blocked user who did this same type of behavior. I have warned the user and will block them if the behavior continues. The pages are relevant but just missing basic information like a summary sentence and categories, so feel free to edit and add information to them. let me know if this behavior continues. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 17:53, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
Hi, It appears that the user has created more blank pages. TotallyLogicalTalk 20:42, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
Also, you can go ahead and delete those pages, I copied the names to my sandbox and I will work on them from there rather than trying to find those pages later. Here is the list of pages which need deleting. Thanks, TotallyLogicalTalk 20:58, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, the user has been blocked. --Jeff (talk) 21:45, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
No Problem TotallyLogicalTalk 22:33, September 12, 2019 (UTC)

Vandal(s) attack

Hi Jeff,

There are a couple of vandals on the loose renaming pages, editing userpages, remving content, and inserting nnsense, etc. Likely sockpuppets as they seem to edit the same page(s).

In addition, please delete this page and rename this page back to Jackson Storm. I reverted the rest. Thanks, KevinTalk 01:26, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I hope I've blocked the 2 main culprits and deleted/cleaned up anything remaining. There are a couple other users on my list to watch. Thanks! --Jeff (talk) 01:47, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Another Vandal (Likely Sock)

Hi Jeff,

We have another vandal (I think it's a sock) vandalizing the Jackson Storm page. Sense they just blanked the page and added category's, I was able to revert it and restore the page. Thanks, KevinTalk 16:30, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, the user has been blocked. --Jeff (talk) 16:33, September 16, 2019 (UTC)
No problem! KevinTalk 16:35, September 16, 2019 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+