FANDOM

TheSitcomLover

Blocked
  • I live in Earth
  • I am Male

Welcome

Hi! Welcome to Pixar Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Holley Shiftwell page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Dvcnut (talk) 8:31, February 1, 2011

Lotso returning in Toy Story 4

Will Lotso return in Toy Story 4 (if there ever is one) and, like, seek revenge on Woody, Buzz Lightyear, and the other toys? Because I can't wait for something epic like that to happen! -- TheSitcomLover 2:01, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

There isn't going to be a Toy Story 4? Look here: http://movies.sky.com/no-plans-for-toy-story-4

Why ain't they gonna make Toy Story 4? Why? -- TheSitcomLover 9:19, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Well from what they're saying is now it looks like there won't be. But remember a few years after Toy Story 2, everyone wanted a third film. And they said they cancelled it soon in the mid-2000s. But in 2010, we got a third film. So it goes to show. Pixarfandom 7:04, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

It goes to show what? -- TheSitcomLover 2:49, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

That they might make a another sequel. Although no plans have been made, so it's highly unlikely. Although, there is a short (I'm sure you know this) connected with Cars 2 called Hawaiian Vacation because of many fans wanting another Toy Story movie. -- Pixarfandom 11:51, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I've heard about that short (which was originally going to be called Hawaii). It's about Ken and Barbie wanting to go to Hawaii to have a fun vacation, but the other toys put up a little Hawaii set in Bonnie's room, but that did not work. -- TheSitcomLover 5:38, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Will they ever create A Bug's Life 2?

Although Flik mentioned A Bug's Life 2 in the outtakes of Toy Story 2, will Pixar ever make an actual Bug's Life 2 film? --TheSitcomLover 10:10, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think so. That film wasn't very successful compared to Toy Story. -- Pixarfandom 11:58, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

What do ya mean? -- TheSitcomLover 5:04, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

I mean that the box office results weren't as much. -- Pixarfandom 12:14, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

"The box office results weren't as much?" What's THAT supposed to mean? I'm confused. /:( - TheSitcomLover 5:38, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Actually, I misread something. They were about the same. Sorry, TheSitcomLover. Although because it's been about 13 years since it was released, it is highly unlikely. Do you hope there would be a sequel to every Pixar films, or only your favorites? -- Pixarfandom 12:51, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

To every Pixar film. Like The Incredibles, Finding Nemo, A Bug's Life, Up, Ratatouille, Brave (though it hasn't even come out yet), Monsters, Inc., Planes (even though that also hasn't been released yet), and WALL·E. -- TheSitcomLover 6:10, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Why? -- Pixarfandom 13:28, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

"Why" what? -- TheSitcomLover 6:58, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Why do you want there to be sequels to every Pixar film, including those which haven't yet been released? -- Pixarfandom 14:22, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oh. Well, it's just that I think they're pretty awesome. And I feel that the ones which haven't been released yet will be pretty awesome. Don't you think, Pixarfandom? - TheSitcomLover 7:50, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

A bit. Although I think Pixar only makes a sequel to one of their films if they have a good story. And another thing, Planes is not a Pixar film. -- Pixarfandom 15:22, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Huh? I don't understand. It looks and sounds pretty Pixar to me. -- TheSitcomLover 9:11, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Look here, and then you will know it is NOT a Pixar film: http://pixar.wikia.com/Planes, and look at the first line. -- Pixarfandom 16:32, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, Pixarfandom! I looked at the first line, and now I realize it's not a Pixar film! Thanks for showin' me buddy! -- TheSitcomLover 10:13, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

And another thing, Pixar needs more single movies. If they made, Toy Story 4 and 5 or A Bug's Life 2 and 3, there wouldn't be room for stuff like The Incredibles, Finding Nemo, Monsters, Inc.,Cars, Ratatouille, WALL-E, and Up. D'uh. Funnyboy2963 10:44, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Lotso's Evil Nasty Rules article

I've never heard of this short, and it's on none of the DVDs. There is no such thing as Lotso's Evil Nasty Rules. I recommend this page should really be deleted. Pixarfandom 11:31, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

No! Don't delete it, Pixarfandom! It DOES exist! --TheSitcomLover 4:40, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Prove it then. Give me a proper official source. Meanwhile, I'm keeping it as put up for deletion, to see what the other users think. Pixarfandom 15:55, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Well, I couldn't find an official source. But I know it exists. And you know it too, don't ya? -- TheSitcomLover 12:38, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

No I do not know it exists. And as you haven't gave me a source, that page will ultimately be deleted. End of story. Pixarfandom 11:52, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Well then, if it does not exist, then how come it's on the Toy Story 3 DVD? Huh? -- TheSitcomLover 5:05, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I have never heard of this short. Will someone confirm if there is truly a short on the TS3 DVD? Tell me the exact disc and title. Otherwise it must be deleted. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 13:23, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

It will be deleted. I even have proof this short doesn't exist. Look at the images below (these are the Special Features on the Toy Story 3 DVD I have). Pixarfandom 15:44, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I also have the Toy Story 3 DVD. But I did not look at the Special Features. -- TheSitcomLover 8:53, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

It has been deleted. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 16:09, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, whatever. -- TheSitcomLover 9:13, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Deleting articles

I've always wondered, how can you delete an article? -- TheSitcomLover 12:33pm, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

You need to be a sysop/administrator. --Jeff (talk) 1:06, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

What's an administrator? I ain't never heard of that before. - TheSitcomLover 3:16, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

You've never heard of an administrator?! Don't you know? It's a person who has overall control over something, e.g. a computer. -- Pixarfandom 12:19, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Do you have overall control over a computer? -- TheSitcomLover 6:27, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

What's that got to do with Pixar Wiki? -- Pixarfandom 12:45, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Huh? What chu mean? -- TheSitcomLover 3:11, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Please don't ask, TheSitcomLover. I MEAN it. -- Puffle339 The Nyan Cat 23:52, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

Huh? /:( -- TheSitcomLover 5:15pm, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

All right, this is getting out of hand and weird. Going back to the actual discussion, Jeff is an administrator, meaning he is one of the heads of the wiki, as well as Ryan, Scott, and Danny. Scott and Danny, the founders of this wiki, are also Wikia staff members. To be able to delete articles, you need to be either the founder of a wiki or some sort of administrator on the wiki, because there are different kinds of administrators. --Aaron 2:52, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Stub template

Pixar wiki stub template

This template won't work.

Why can't you use the stub template on Pixar Wiki? It works on other wikis, but why not this one? What's goin' on? -- TheSitcomLover 9:24, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Leave this message on Jeff's page. -- Pixarfandom 16:33, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, Pixarfandom. Will do. -- TheSitcomLover 10:16, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

All right, Pixarfandom! I already left the message on Dvcnut's page! -- TheSitcomLover 10:28, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

But can you still tell me why the Pixar Wiki stub template won't work? -- TheSitcomLover 4:03, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Where did you get that picture? -- Pixarfandom 12:44, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

I made it myself. Pretty neat, eh? -- TheSitcomLover 3:15, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Villain in Finding Nemo?

Who is the primary antagonist in the 2003 film Finding Nemo? -- TheSitcomLover 10:27, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Philip Sherman is the main antagonist, because he keeps Nemo. -- Pixarfandom 6:59, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, yeah! I remember now! Thanks a lot, Pixarfandom! At first, I was confused, but now you helped me out and told me who the villain in Finding Nemo was! Thanks! You're a good friend on Pixar Wiki! :) -- TheSitcomLover 2:37, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Slinky's eyebrows

Toy story slinky 1995-1999 2010-present

Slinky's eyebrows changed from 1995 to 2010

Did Andy make Slinky's eyebrows look a bit thinner by putting orange paint over the top of his eyebrows in Toy Story 3? -- TheSitcomLover 12:56pm, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Must be a mistake. -- Pixarfandom 8:26, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

How can it be a mistake? Maybe Andy just decided to put orange paint over Slink's eyebrows to make them look thinner! -- TheSitcomLover 8:29, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

I mean a production mistake. -- Pixarfandom 11:20, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Or maybe Andy just decided to paint orange paint over Slinky's eyebrows to make them look thinner. I also paint my toys, so maybe that's what Andy did. Ya know what I mean? -- TheSitcomLover 3:19, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Do NOT create empty pages

You have been warned on numerous occasions about creating single-line (or now, even completely empty) pages. You must stop this behavior or you will be blocked. There is no value in creating blank pages. --Jeff (talk) 12:39, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, dude. I'm sorry. But can you still improve the Toy Story (series) article for me? - TheSitcomLover 5:49, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Your doing it again!!!!! Whats wrong with you? Are you thick headed? Don't you listen to rules? Its really annoying when you create hundreds of pages, and leave them empty. Don't you know what a WIKI is? Its whole purpose is for INFORMATION........not EMPTY PAGES. If your creating pages, at least know what your creating..........my gosh. Endrizzi427 15:54, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Will there be Monsters, Inc. 3?

Will Pixar ever create an all-new Monsters, Inc. 3 film (after they do Monsters University)? -- TheSitcomLover 3:32, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Let's wait until the second film comes out, then we think about a third film! -- Pixarfandom 11:57, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oh okay, Pixarfandom. Great idea! -- TheSitcomLover 3:14pm, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

Editing other user pages

You edited Gray Catbird's user page. That is not cool. Each user can maintain his/her page as they see fit. -- Jeff (talk) 15:30, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Dvcnut, dude, I'm just trying to help others and fix the mistakes they've made. I'm not bein' mean or anything. -- TheSitcomLover 12:43, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Maybe, but still, a user's homepage is like their own personal space. It's just not proper etiquette and shouldn't be done. Thanks! -- Jeff (talk) 13:51, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

So the user(s) won't ever edit their own homepage(s) and fix all the mistakes they've made over the years? --TheSitcomLover 9:39, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I think what Jeff means is that users like editing their mistakes themselves, and dislike it if someone else does it for them. I'm sure the user would notice these "mistakes" some time. -- Pixarfandom 17:24, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Hm, maybe they will. Who knows? - TheSitcomLover 2:39, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Improving articles

Why do you keep asking other users to improve articles for you? Why don't you improve it yourself? Pixarfandom 16:49, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Pixarfandom, please don't be mean or I'll report you! -- TheSitcomLover 8:49, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I apologize if I'm being mean. I don't want to be mean to you. I was just asking you questions from which I didn't understand. And please don't report me. I said sorry, so are we good? Pixarfandom 16:23, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

We're good. I forgive you. :) -- TheSitcomLover 9:27, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Pixarfandom 17:04, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

No problem. I'm glad I could be a good friend in Pixar Wiki. -- TheSitcomLover 2:41, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Your edits

If you want to correct punctuation on pages, that's fine. But your Mike's New Car edit, wasn't very good. It's too overly detailed. And another thing, upload high quality images rather than small, I've seen you doing this quite a lot. -- Pixarfandom 6:54, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about the Mike's New Car edit. I tried my best (and sorry if it was overly detailed). - TheSitcomLover 12:45, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Finding Nemo trilogy????

Where's this coming from? There is only one Finding Nemo. Pixarfandom 11:40, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah but I mean, like, the Finding Nemo video games and, you know, other stuff that has to do with Finding Nemo. -- TheSitcomLover 5:02, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Besides, they might even add a sequel and TV series. Who knows? -- TheSitcomLover 6:27, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

A couple of points. First, we want the Pixar Wiki to only contain factual information (that does not include user pages or talk pages). So if there are assumptions, guesses, etc. on a page, it should be removed. Second, the word "Trilogy" has a very specific meaning - 3 of something. The only trilogy Pixar has done is the Toy Story series. So using the word "Trilogy" for meaning video games, the Finding Nemo film, soundtrack, etc. would be incorrect use of that term and cause confusion.
Is there some page regarding Finding Nemo that contains "Trilogy?" I did a quick search and didn't see it. --Jeff (talk) 13:49, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Oh. My bad. - TheSitcomLover 6:53, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Dory as Nemo's new mother

Dory and Nemo

Dory would make a pretty good mother

If there ever was a Finding Nemo 2, do you think Dory would be great at being Nemo's new mother (since Nemo's original mother, Coral, passed away)? - TheSitcomLover 2:53, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Could be. That's a good question. Although I think Dory would be just a close friend rather than a mother. -- Pixarfandom 11:56, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Or maybe Marlin can eventually marry Dory, and then Dory will be Nemo's stepmother! Does that sound good to you? -- TheSitcomLover 5:10, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

I don't have any idea. Although a clownfish X pacific regal tang... I don't know if that could work as they're two different types of fish. -- Pixarfandom 12:16, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

True, but it can still work, can't it? - TheSitcomLover 5:38, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

I don't know if it could work. You'd have to ask someone who's an expert in sea life. -- Pixarfandom 12:52, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well, do you know someone who's an expert in sealife? -- TheSitcomLover 6:13, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

No, not at all. -- Pixarfandom 13:27, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well... maybe you could ask one of the Wikians of Pixar Wiki and ask them if they know anything about sealife. Why don't cha try that? -- TheSitcomLover 6:55, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Why don't you? --Pixarfandom 14:23, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well... I can try. Hey Pixarfandom, are *you* an expert of sealife? - TheSitcomLover 7:54, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Not especially. You could ask someone at an aquarium (just a suggestion). -- Pixarfandom 15:22, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well have you been to the aquarium before, Pixarfandom? -- TheSitcomLover 8:52, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Yes. And I've actually seen the real-life Nemo and Marlin. -- Pixarfandom 15:58, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

You mean two clownfishes that looked like Nemo and Marlin? -- TheSitcomLover 10:32, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pixarfandom, do you mean two clownfishes that looked like Marlin and Nemo? -- TheSitcomLover 8:37, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Yes. When I say, "And I've actually seen the real-life Nemo and Marlin," I mean I've seen the actual species. Am I clear? -- Pixarfandom 12:43, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Yes. -- TheSitcomLover 3:23, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

... -- Puffle339 The Nyan Cat 13:42, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
File:Pict countolafrocks 625416.gif

/:( -- TheSitcomLover 11:40pm, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Cars (video game) article

Why did you add this page?! There is already an article which has that name, but the proper title is called "Cars: The Video Game." I am talking to Jeff about this. Next time, check the wiki's articles before adding a kind of duplicate. - Pixarfandom 16:10, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'm sorry, man! I didn't know! - TheSitcomLover 9:16, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Fine, I will let you off this time, although I've just left a message on Jeff's page about it. -- Pixarfandom 16:20, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Also, can you please delete the Cars (video game) article? Because I'm going to rename Cars: The Video Game "Cars (video game)" okay? -- TheSitcomLover 9:34, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

No, not really. I renamed Cars (video game) (what it was called back then) to "Cars: The Video Game," to match the other Pixar video games. --Pixarfandom 17:07, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Oh other Pixar video games, like Toy Story 3: The Video Game? -- TheSitcomLover 10:28, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, exactly. -- Pixarfandom 17:50, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

And will you also do Cars 2: The Video Game? - TheSitcomLover 12:19pm, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Already did that. -- Pixarfandom 7:00, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Thanks for lettin' me know. TheSitcomLover 2:43, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Will there ever be a Finding Nemo 2?

Will they ever create a Finding Nemo sequel? --TheSitcomLover 9:57, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I doubt it; they haven't confirmed anything new to do with Finding Nemo. Is Finding Nemo your favorite Pixar movie? My one is The Incredibles, but I'm sure my new one will be Cars 2. It sounds awesome! Pixarfandom 17:08, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, Finding Nemo is my favorite Pixar film. But will Pixar ever confirm planning to make Finding Nemo 2? I mean like, can't you go to their website and convince them to create Finding Nemo 2, A Bug's Life 2, The Incredibles 2, a Finding Nemo TV show, a Bug's Life TV show, and an Incredibles TV show? -- TheSitcomLover 10:17, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

I don't know. I've never tried. Although you could try and send a message to Lee Unkrich's Twitter account as loads of fans did by asking him if there would be a Toy Story 4 as now, it turns out there won't be. Try and post a message to Lee Unkrich. He may answer you. -- Pixarfandom 17:22, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

And how do you know there won't be a Toy Story 4? There might be one someday in the future. You never know. -- TheSitcomLover 12:12pm, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

You're right. There is a chance there will be a Toy Story 4, or a Finding Nemo 2. And that's fine to wonder about on your home or talk page. But like I mentioned earlier, we should not put predictions or rumors in the regular wiki pages - we only want official information on those pages. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 21:18, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I know. But thanks for telling me. :) - TheSitcomLover 2:46, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Why do you put "Will there be a Finding Nemo 2?" It's really annoying! Sometimes I don't have an answer for everything! And besides, talk about things besides a sequel. -- Pixarfandom 7:04, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry if I'm annoying you, Pixarfandom, but I'm just so curious about things! -- TheSitcomLover 3:14, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Will there also be a Toy Story Christmas special?

I know I'm askin' too many questions and stuff, but will Pixar also make an all-new Toy Story Christmas special and air it on television? -- TheSitcomLover 5:53, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think so. -- Pixarfandom 12:54, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well hopefully they will. And if they do make it, I think the perfect date for it to release is on December 25, 2014, don't you think? A 2014 Toy Story Christmas special. -- TheSitcomLover 6:52, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well Toy Story is a film, not a TV series. So they will most likely not make a Christmas special. --Pixarfandom 14:25, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oh come, now! Shrek is a film, and they made specials! And check out Kung Fu Panda! They made a special to that! So maybe they'll make a special to Toy Story! -- TheSitcomLover 7:57, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Remember this, TheSitcomLover, Pixar is very different compared to DreamWorks. -- Pixarfandom 15:24, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Huh? Wh-- what do ya mean, Pixarfandom? -- TheSitcomLover 8:33, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Well what they do with animation is different. Research if you want to know why. - Pixarfandom 15:59, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

The animation's different, like... how? -- TheSitcomLover 10:35, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

How they do things are different. And can you please stop asking these kind of questions? -- Pixarfandom 7:05, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Do you mean I'm annoying and this is sorta like the Terrible Twos? Now my feelings are kinda hurt. :'( -- TheSitcomLover 3:19, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

I've got no idea of what you are talking about. -- Pixarfandom 12:17, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Since you asked me to please stop asking these kind of questions, it seems to me like you don't like my curiosity. -- TheSitcomLover 6:24, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Toy Story 5

Will Pixar also make a Toy Story 5 when they have a chance? -- TheSitcomLover 12:38pm, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Are you being serious? Since there is no talk of making TS4 and it's pure conjecture to guess what Pixar will do in the future, these questions regarding if they will make a sequel or not are just not able to be answered. --Jeff (talk) 1:03, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Of course I'm bein' serious! I'm just a curious guy! -- TheSitcomLover 3:21, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Finding Nemo "franchise"

I've seen that you have been doing this a lot. Could you please undo all of this? Thanks. -- Pixarfandom 15:25, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

No I can't. You know why? Because the franchise is the Finding Nemo video games and others. See how that works (I don't mean to be rude)? -- TheSitcomLover 8:30, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

No I don't see how that works. People usually refer to franchise as films. They refer to all in general (which is film, video game, and others) as "World." You see? Can you now undo all of that "Finding Nemo franchise" now? Because it really is unnecessary. -- Pixarfandom 16:02, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

First of all, Pixarfandom, you just said that the people refer to all in general as "World," and you said, "Which is film, video game, and others." So that means that the Finding Nemo franchise is a film and video games. Don't you understand? -- TheSitcomLover 10:39, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

No, I completely don't. And you have to undo all of that phrase, otherwise I will. -- Pixarfandom 7:05, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, you completely do! You just said it! -- TheSitcomLover 3:23, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

No, I completely don't. I know what I think and feel. -- Pixarfandom 12:16, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Well it sounds like you understand to me. -- TheSitcomLover 6:19, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Well then you're not reading my message properly. -- Pixarfandom 13:45, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

What?! Yes I am! -- TheSitcomLover 12:41pm, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Whatever I am saying now is correct. Don't put "Finding Nemo franchise." Thank you. -- Pixarfandom 7:01, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, Pixarfandom. I won't, unless there is a Finding Nemo sequel (and TV show). -- TheSitcomLover 6:08, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Would you mind...

...Replying on other people's talk pages? Otherwise they aren't alerted of new messages. And, for your question things (such as "Will there be a Finding Nemo 2?"), you can use the user blog for that. Bye! --Dragonian King Talk Blog 1:22, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, Dragonian King! Thanks for the helpful suggestion! -- TheSitcomLover 3:26, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Sequels

Can you please stop talking about sequels?! Not to mention TS5 (which is ridiculous) as they haven't even made a 4 yet! And a 3rd Monsters, Inc. as even the second one hasn't come out yet! -- Pixarfandom 7:07, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

All right all right, Pixarfandom! I'm sorry for talking about sequels! No need to shout! -- TheSitcomLover 3:29, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not shouting, I'm typing. -- Pixarfandom 12:15, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

I know you are typing, but just don't scold me like that! -- TheSitcomLover 6:17, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

I'm not trying to scold you. I'm just saying. --Pixarfandom 13:46, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Saying what? -- TheSitcomLover 12:49pm, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Stop talking about sequels. -- Pixarfandom 7:00, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Why? You don't like sequels? -- TheSitcomLover 6:11, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

I do like sequels. It's just when you keep on going and going is annoying. --Pixarfandom 8:24, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, okay, Pixarfandom. I apologize. -- TheSitcomLover 8:15, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

"Don't delete! Don't delete!" or "Please don't change."

Why do you keep typing that in your edits?! Users can do anything they want on this wiki, so you really must stop typing that message. Jeff talked to you about this. -- Pixarfandom 12:44, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Because whenever I edit an article and make it look perfect for me and other users, usually, every time I'd leave, someone edits the article and puts it back to the way it was before, and I don't like that. Understand? -- TheSitcomLover 6:15, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

"Nopety nopety new."
Linguini, after being asked numerous questions by Skinner

No, not really at all. Everyone has the right to edit articles on this wiki unless it has been protected. So, anyway, typing that message just makes you stand out. -- Pixarfandom 13:49, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

It just makes me stand out? What? -- TheSitcomLover 12:52pm, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Your're just putting so much attention to yourself. You're drawing attention, and that can annoy them. -- Pixarfandom 6:59, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Well, I don't mean to annoy them. I'm just real curious. -- TheSitcomLover 6:16, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Creating categories

PLEASE do not create any new categories. You are creating ones that really serve no purpose. I have explained this before; most of the categories being created are too detailed and can usually be found in different ways. If you'd like, please ask me first and I can will assist with creating them. It just causes me a lot of time to go back and delete the categories, remove them from pages, etc. Your following this will be much appreciated. --Jeff (talk) 19:27, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

So you didn't want me to create the category "Real people?" But we need it so other users won't mistake some real people for Pixar characters (LOL). -- TheSitcomLover 12:33pm, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry

Attention all Pixar Wikians! Attention please! I just wanted to say, I am very, very very sorry I'm annoying all of you with all my questions about sequels and stuff. So can you forgive me? -- TheSitcomLover 6:20, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

I'd leave this message on everyone's talk page. -- Pixarfandom 8:25, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

You would? -- TheSitcomLover 8:13, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked you. I did this for a couple of reasons. First, you continue to edit existing content on people's user and talk pages (today you edited User: Pixarfandom user page). You CANNOT edit other people's user pages. You CANNOT edit other people's talk pages (unless it's your own comment), or comments others leave on your talk page (even if you're only "fixing" it) - only edit your own comments. Second, you added to the vandalism that User:Harry675 created. You need to use good judgement when someone adds pages regarding any new Pixar movies. In fact, I always suspect vandalism when a new movie or short is announced or created unless a verifiable reference is provided. At this point your block will last 7 days. --Jeff (talk) 2:55, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

OK, your block comes off in a couple of days. I'd like to ask you to go slowly with any new edits. Also, we've had a couple of hits recently from vandals. Do not feed into this. If you question whether something is true or not, give it a day to see if anyone rolls it back, or ask someone. If you fall back into old habits, I will block you again. Thanks. --Jeff (talk) 12:04, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

As you can now edit, here are a few things to remember.

  1. Try and upload high resolution images, so visitors can see a clearer picture
  2. Make you thumbnails about 250px, smaller than that isn't really worth anything
  3. Try and talk about sequels with others who are interested in that fact, because if you don't, you just end up annoying everyone,
  4. Please do not put "Please don't change" or "Don't delete!" or anything like that, because it annoys us a lot. Any user has the right to do what they want on this wiki. And anyway, if someone undo's your edit, all you have to do is do it back, that's what the rest of us do. But try and avoid and edit war.
  5. Adding a synopsis to articles. Well, that is absolutey fine, but don't put very detailed synopsis's to short synopsis's. They're just shorts, so they don't need a long synopsis.
  6. Pixar movies: Please do not add anything about a film by Pixar without any proper source. Because you're just copying what Harry675 created, and you don't want to be like him do you?
  7. Try and not edit other people's user pages, because they might get annoyed with you.

So there, just remember these seven and you'll fit just fine. About three months ago you abused multiple accounts, but now I can see you learned your lesson from that. So, now just follow those seven tips, and you will not annoy anybody, although if you don't do 2 and 5, I'll just do it for you. Thanks for reading. -- Pixarfandom 7:42, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, Pixarfandom! Thanks! -- TheSitcomLover 12:51, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Buster's ears

Toy-story-1999-2010-pixar-past-old-young-buster-woody

Buster's ears changed from 1999 to 2010

Why did the animators make Buster's ears look a bit shorter in Toy Story 3?! -- TheSitcomLover 4:09, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Just a production error. -- Pixarfandom 11:19, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean? -- TheSitcomLover 4:49, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

You know, sometimes when they make films they make mistakes. Look here: Mistakes found in Pixar films. -- Pixarfandom 12:41, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah I know, but how could they make a mistake like that? I mean, how could they forget how Young Buster's ears looked? Why couldn't they just try and remember what they looked like and make the old Buster's ears look like that? -- TheSitcomLover 7:07pm, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Stop asking editors to go to Hoodwinked Wiki

Yes I know it's quite messed up, but asking users, new or experienced, to improve this wiki, is quite unnecessary. You can be conceived. If you stop doing this, we'll let the matter rest, and we'll forget about it. -- Pixarfandom 17:12, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Conceived? -- TheSitcomLover 4:17pm, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry. I meant to say, "You can be conceived as annoying." Mis-type, that's all. -- Pixarfandom 8:25, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Why is everyone saying I'm annoying?! I take that as an insult! -- TheSitcomLover 3:26, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

"Oh, do ya?"
Minny hearing Lightning McQueen's knowledge of the Interstate.

Well perhaps you should change to not be "insulted". -- Pixarfandom 8:43, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

What is that supposed to mean?! -- TheSitcomLover 1:55, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

Okay, unfortunately I have had to block you indefinitely. You've created dozen of new, empty pages that I will now need to go back and remove. Your edits cause too much work for the others on the wiki. --Jeff (talk) 15:57, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry 'bout that, Dvcnut. I forgot. -- TheSitcomLover 9:02, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

No, I don't think you are sorry. You obviously have not grasped the concept of the wiki, that it is about creating valuable content that cannot be found elsewhere on the Internet. You have been given enough warnings. I have also now blocked your ability to comment on your talk page. --Jeff (talk) 15:57, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+